- From: Philip Jägenstedt <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 21:21:19 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/102/196647324@github.com>
So it sounds like we can reasonably assume that none of the 3 EventTarget methods are needed for compat. Having usage data would still be nice, of course. The remaining uncertainty is all the remaining constants, attributes and methods of Node. For example `ownerDocument`, that does return the creating document. Someone just needs to go through all of these and think about which make *any* potential sense and which are simply useless and unlikely to be needed. `insertBefore()` is one method which has never done anything sensible and is unlikely to be needed. In other news, chromestatus.com is back up, and is showing just 0.0002% for cloneNode: https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/1034 I have been hesitant to just add everything from Node to Attr for measurement purposes, because that in itself carries *some* small risk, but I don't think there's any other way around it. @DigiTec, are you able to instrument this in Edge without making web-facing changes, or would you be willing to make the web-facing changes in order to measure it? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/102#issuecomment-196647324
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2016 04:21:46 UTC