- From: Richard Maher <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:53:46 -0800
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Sunday, 13 March 2016 02:54:21 UTC
Hi Jake, If you scroll up to the "Here's the code" example (and thanks for tidying up) you'll see that REPLIED is a boolean that was there to prevent respondWith() being called more than once. REPLY is called by each thread when it decides it has a response contender. This logic is redundant now that I've had to move to a Promise (probably better anyway). That is, the Promise is settled once and forever so the late comers can knock themselves out without any exceptions thrown. Now if I can just apply that Promise logic to why inBuff ends up resolved after it's REJECT has been called then I'll be done. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/844#issuecomment-195859322
Received on Sunday, 13 March 2016 02:54:21 UTC