- From: Jan Miksovsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:21:48 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 7 March 2016 22:22:38 UTC
Ah, my bad, I'd been thrown off my experience with the v0 implementation in Blink. Of the choices already listed, then, I'd prefer `:unresolved` (with the accompanying spec changes) or `:not(:upgraded)`. While I like the intent of `:unupgraded`, I fear it will be hard for people to visually parse (especially if they're not familiar with the upgrade terminology) and it feels like a mouthful. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/418#issuecomment-193481915
Received on Monday, 7 March 2016 22:22:38 UTC