- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 22:42:40 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/webcomponents/issues/417/192594110@github.com>
I don't feel too strongly about this, and would like to defer to @esprehn and others he thinks are best to consult. But: > This behavior precludes authors from overriding method on a particular instance of a custom element. In order to change even a single instance's behavior, you would have to define a new custom element or make the element call its own delegate method which is unnecessary boilerplate. I think this is actually a desirable property. A given class of elements is supposed to have fixed behavior. Just like overriding `myEl.click = ...` does not change the behavior when an element is clicked, overriding `myEl.attributeChangedCallback = ...` should not change the behavior when an element is changed. Per-element runtime customization should not be a goal of custom element callbacks, IMO. If an element is specifically designed to be extensible in this way, and have per-instance customizability, then I think an opt-in via `attributeChangedCallback(...args) { onAttributeChanged(...args) }` or similar makes a lot of sense, and doesn't count as unnecessary boilerplate. What do you think? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/417#issuecomment-192594110
Received on Saturday, 5 March 2016 06:43:11 UTC