- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 02:11:26 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2016 10:11:54 UTC
I think everyone agrees that shadow trees should work irrespective of the shadow-host-including inclusive ancestor being document (i.e., in disconnected trees as you call them). But I don't think we have a plan for the terminology yet. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/382#issuecomment-191169209
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2016 10:11:54 UTC