public-webapps-github@w3.org from June 2016 by date

Thursday, 30 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Vincent Scheib
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Yoav Weiss
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Review Web Annotations specs (#93) Ivan Herman
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Yoav Weiss
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Yoav Weiss
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Observer API for fetch registry (#65) Chieh-Ting Yeh
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Chris Dumoulin
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminate usage of entry and incumbent settings objects (#922) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Yoav Weiss
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Yoav Weiss
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Ben Kelly
• [w3c/uievents] load event details (#92) Tomek Wytrębowicz
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Yoav Weiss
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Matt Giuca
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Yoav Weiss
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Matt Giuca
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Support Event.composed (#89) Hayato Ito
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminate usage of entry and incumbent settings objects (#922) Jungkee Song
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Ben
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add steps to intercept requests using foreign fetch. (#329) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) Xidorn Quan

Wednesday, 29 June 2016

• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Performance API's, Security and Privacy (#120) Peter Linss
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminate usage of entry and incumbent settings objects (#922) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Vibrate feature for Gamepad (#19) chris van wiemeersch
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) Rick Byers
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Support Event.composed in Touch Events (#66) Rick Byers
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Custom]: Need callback for form submit data (bugzilla: 24603) (#187) David Ford
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) Rick Byers
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components and Form Submit Fields (#529) David Ford
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components and Form Submit Fields (#529) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components and Form Submit Fields (#529) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add steps to intercept requests using foreign fetch. (#329) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components and Form Submit Fields (#529) David Ford
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add steps to intercept requests using foreign fetch. (#329) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add steps to intercept requests using foreign fetch. (#329) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Jake Archibald
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) Yoav Weiss
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Rick Byers
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Jake Archibald
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Tweak ReadableByteStreamControllerEnqueue algorithm structure (#473) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Tweak ReadableByteStreamControllerEnqueue algorithm structure (#473) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Trey Shugart
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Ability to define Custom Element attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters for those attributes). (#517) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Matt Giuca
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/screen-orientation] Timing of triggering change event doesn't look right (#89) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (#474) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (#474) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Rick Byers
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Install event definition is missing some details (#475) Rick Byers
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Install event definition is missing some details (#475) Rick Byers
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Matt Giuca
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Install event definition is missing some details (#475) Matt Giuca
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Matt Giuca
• [w3c/manifest] Install event definition is missing some details (#475) Rick Byers
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Trey Shugart

Tuesday, 28 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) smaug----
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Include Minimal Store/Catalog MetaData in Manifest (#448) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Include Minimal Store/Catalog MetaData in Manifest (#448) Marcos Cáceres
• [whatwg/fetch] Add steps to intercept requests using foreign fetch. (#329) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Specify serviceworker link type for link element and link header. (#828) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Don't associate a job with a client, instead just have a referrer. (#889) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Don't associate a job with a client, instead just have a referrer. (#889) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• [whatwg/streams] Tweak ReadableByteStreamControllerEnqueue algorithm structure (#473) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Define interactions with `contextmenu` event? (#68) staktrace
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Define interactions with `contextmenu` event? (#68) staktrace
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Rob Dolin (MSFT)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Tighten the assertion on the owner stream in ReadableStreamReaderGene… (#472) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] tighten ReadableStreamReaderGenericRelease assertion (#466) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableByteStreamControllerClose accesses first element of pendingPullIntos without checking array length (#470) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix pendingPullIntos access in ReadableByteStreamControllerClose() (#471) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Ben Kelly
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Jake Archibald
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Include Minimal Store/Catalog MetaData in Manifest (#448) Rob Dolin (MSFT)
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Ben Kelly
• [w3c/selection-api] Normative refernces (#69) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Jake Archibald
• [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: Clean up gb18030 math (#63) Henri Sivonen
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Matt Giuca
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (#474) Matt Giuca
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (#474) Matt Giuca
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Link to definition of BufferSource (#316) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Link to definition of BufferSource (#316) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Matt Giuca
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) Matt Giuca
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Jake Archibald
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Support registering "actions" (#442) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Support registering "actions" (#442) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Support registering "actions" (#442) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [whatwg/streams] tighten ReadableStreamReaderGenericRelease assertion (#466) Takeshi Yoshino
• [whatwg/streams] Tighten the assertion on the owner stream in ReadableStreamReaderGene… (#472) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableByteStreamControllerClose accesses first element of pendingPullIntos without checking array length (#470) Takeshi Yoshino
• [whatwg/streams] Fix pendingPullIntos access in ReadableByteStreamControllerClose() (#471) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (4fa1775) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (4fa1775) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] distributedCallback for Custom Elements (#527) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Event retargetting in layman's terms? (#528) Michael[tm] Smith
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] distributedCallback for Custom Elements (#527) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] distributedCallback for Custom Elements (#527) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• [w3c/webcomponents] Event retargetting in layman's terms? (#528) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Include Minimal Store/Catalog MetaData in Manifest (#448) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Include Minimal Store/Catalog MetaData in Manifest (#448) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (#474) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (#474) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) Jungkee Song
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) Alex Russell
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) Matt Giuca

Monday, 27 June 2016

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) vanupam
• [whatwg/streams] ReadableByteStreamControllerClose accesses first element of pendingPullIntos without checking array length (#470) Ben Kelly
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Define interactions with `contextmenu` event? (#68) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Define interactions with `contextmenu` event? (#68) staktrace
• [w3c/touch-events] Define interactions with `contextmenu` event? (#68) Rick Byers
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) vanupam
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) vanupam
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) J.C. Jones
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Fix #89. Make some of UI Events composed events (#91) Gary Kacmarcik
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Support Event.composed (#89) Gary Kacmarcik
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) PhistucK
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) PhistucK
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) PhistucK
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) Ben Kelly
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Presentation API Request for Feedback (#61) Anssi Kostiainen
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] FormData's append method does not match browsers (#73) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) Jungkee Song
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) Jungkee Song
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Ivan Herman
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Need to specify client of image objects when fetching (an environment settings object) (#465) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Need to specify client of image objects when fetching... (#465) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/url] https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#idl-index (#129) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] FormData's append method does not match browsers (#73) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Fix #89. Make some of UI Events composed events (#91) Hayato Ito
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Hayato Ito
• [whatwg/url] https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#idl-index (#129) sourdieselOG

Sunday, 26 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Trey Shugart
• [whatwg/xhr] FormData's append method does not match browsers (#73) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify IDBOpenDBRequest processing as a queue? (#79) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify IDBOpenDBRequest processing as a queue? (#79) beidson

Saturday, 25 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify IDBOpenDBRequest processing as a queue? (#79) Joshua Bell
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why doesn't cache.match support `cacheName` (#917) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Kill the progress event when readyState is 4 (#72) Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why doesn't cache.match support `cacheName` (#917) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why doesn't cache.match support `cacheName` (#917) Remy Sharp
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Exposing cross-origin resource size (#31) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Sentence fragment when making CORS preflight request (#328) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/storage] Create explicit security/privacy section (#35) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Meta: add advice on using the Bikeshed HTTP API (#274) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify IDBOpenDBRequest processing as a queue? (#79) beidson
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) Elliott Sprehn
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] distributedCallback (#527) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) Joseph Orbegoso Pea

Friday, 24 June 2016

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Disconnect single target instead of all (#126) Justin Fagnani
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify IDBOpenDBRequest processing as a queue? (#79) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should WindowClient.navigate(url) navigate with "replacement enabled"? (#918) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Sentence fragment when making CORS preflight request (#328) Josh Matthews
• [whatwg/fetch] Sentence fragment when making CORS preflight request (#328) Josh Matthews
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Russell Bicknell
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) Ruben Verborgh
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) aliams
• [whatwg/dom] Meta: add advice on using the Bikeshed HTTP API (#274) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add forEach to disallowed member names for iterable (#132) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] how can i implement a global Interceptor of error with fetchjs (#327) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] how can i implement a global Interceptor of error with fetchjs (#327) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• [whatwg/fetch] how can i implement a global Interceptor of error with fetchjs (#327) Rick Lee
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Hayato Ito
• [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) Hayato Ito
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [whatwg/storage] The term "site" is confusing (#32) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] eTLD -> public suffix? (#33) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] The term "site" is confusing (#32) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) Jungkee Song
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Classify 'Application Cache' as site storage (#30) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Classify 'Application Cache' as site storage (#30) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should WindowClient.navigate(url) navigate with "replacement enabled"? (#918) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) Hayato Ito
• [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Feedback on the persist() algorithm. (#26) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Feedback on the persist() algorithm. (#26) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Prevent usage in combination with document.domain (#12) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Prevent usage in combination with document.domain (#12) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Hayato Ito
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should WindowClient.navigate(url) navigate with "replacement enabled"? (#918) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Brent
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Hayato Ito

Thursday, 23 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Vincent Scheib
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Change "validate the response" to "process the response" to match HTML (#876) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• [heycam/webidl] Add forEach to disallowed member names for iterable (#132) ddorwin
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Should ReadableStreams with pull sources call pull until full? (#469) jplaisted
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should WindowClient.navigate(url) navigate with "replacement enabled"? (#918) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Russell Bicknell
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] gb18030 encoding/decoding support (#57) r12a
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Communication between workers/windows via Streams API (#244) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Should ReadableStreams with pull sources call pull until full? (#469) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Should ReadableStreams with pull sources call pull until full? (#469) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) Ruben Verborgh
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] ISO 2022-jp encoding/decoding support (#60) r12a
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) Ruben Verborgh
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why does upgrade-an-element queue attribute, connected reactions before exiting early? (#523) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Communication between workers/windows via Streams API (#244) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Communication between workers/windows via Streams API (#244) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why doesn't cache.match support `cacheName` (#917) Ben Kelly
• Re: [WICG/modality] Next steps? (#25) Brian Kardell
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) youennf
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Ivan Herman
• Re: [whatwg/streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Communication between workers/windows via Streams API (#244) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Ivan Herman
• Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update 16-07-28-29SW.md (#41) chaals
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [whatwg/streams] More concrete examples of "optimization" of pipeTo (#359) Takeshi Yoshino
• [w3c/pointerlock] PointerLock and Shadow DOM (#3) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Ensure the JS thread doesn't have to get hit when piping two streams to each other (#97) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow unique start_url for subdomains (#470) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/manifest] Expose API for managing Web App aspects (#472) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest-csp] fix(index): shortname clash (#10) Anssi Kostiainen
• Re: [w3c/manifest-csp] fix(index): shortname clash (#10) Anssi Kostiainen
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest-csp] Change status to unofficial (closes #8) (#9) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest-csp] Change status to unofficial (closes #8) (#9) Anssi Kostiainen
• Re: [w3c/manifest-csp] Change status to unofficial (closes #8) (#9) Anssi Kostiainen
• Re: [w3c/manifest-csp] Change to unofficial draft (#8) Anssi Kostiainen
• [w3c/manifest-csp] fix(index): shortname clash (#10) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/manifest-csp] Change status to unofficial (closes #8) (#9) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/manifest-csp] Change to unofficial draft (#8) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Ivan Herman
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) bmaurer
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Support Event.composed (#89) Hayato Ito
• [w3c/uievents] Fix #89. Make some of UI Events composed events (#91) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Rick Byers
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito

Wednesday, 22 June 2016

• [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update 16-07-28-29SW.md (#41) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• [w3c/IndexedDB] deleteDatabase's "versionchange" should be deferred if upgrade is running (#78) Joshua Bell
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) Ruben Verborgh
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Tzviya
• [whatwg/streams] Should ReadableStreams with pull sources call pull until full? (#469) jplaisted
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Rick Byers
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Joshua Bell
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why doesn't cache.match support `cacheName` (#917) Arthur Stolyar
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why doesn't cache.match support `cacheName` (#917) Remy Sharp
• Re: [heycam/webidl] 'Reject' definition. (#73) Yves Lafon
• Re: [heycam/webidl] 'Reject' definition. (#73) Yves Lafon
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [dontcallmedom/webidl-checker] python no longer support headers with a colon (#18) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [dontcallmedom/webidl-checker] python no longer support headers with a colon (#18) Denis Ah-Kang
• Re: [dontcallmedom/webidl-checker] python no longer support headers with a colon (#18) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [dontcallmedom/webidl-checker] python no longer support headers with a colon (#18) Denis Ah-Kang
• Re: [dontcallmedom/webidl-checker] python no longer support headers with a colon (#18) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [dontcallmedom/webidl-checker] python no longer support headers with a colon (#18) Denis Ah-Kang
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] added a draft for CR revision (#2) Vincent Scheib
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] added a draft for CR revision (#2) Vincent Scheib
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Dru Knox
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Dru Knox
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz

Tuesday, 21 June 2016

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Ian Kilpatrick
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) jan-ivar
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow expressions in addition to keyPaths when creating indexes (#33) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow expressions in addition to keyPaths when creating indexes (#33) Ian Kilpatrick
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) Brandon Jones
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) Chris Dickinson
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Gamepad-specific DOM keys / location? (#79) Rick Byers
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support N-dimensional queries on indexes (#40) Joshua Bell
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) jplaisted
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) jplaisted
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Rick Byers
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) jplaisted
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Dave Herman
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) jplaisted
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Support Event.composed (#89) Rick Byers
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) Rick Byers
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) Ted Mielczarek
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) Domenic Denicola
• [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) jplaisted
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Brent
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) Brandon Jones
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Elliott Sprehn
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) Ted Mielczarek
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Benjamin Gruenbaum
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Benjamin Gruenbaum
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Benjamin Gruenbaum
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Benjamin Gruenbaum
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Benjamin Gruenbaum
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Custom]: define registry primitive; ("namespace" support needed?) (bugzilla: 24578) (#154) Kevin Suttle
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Kill the progress event when readyState is 4 (#72) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) jan-ivar
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Domenic Denicola
• [whatwg/xhr] Kill the progress event when readyState is 4 (#72) Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Handle EUDC before the index in Shift_JIS (#54) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial optimization: Move EUDC before index lookup (#52) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Kagami Sascha Rosylight
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Group constants together in half-width math (#49) Henri Sivonen
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: avoid upsetting lazy compilers (#55) Henri Sivonen
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: avoid upsetting lazy compilers (#55) Henri Sivonen
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Handle EUDC before the index in Shift_JIS (#54) Henri Sivonen
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Handle EUDC before the index in Shift_JIS (#54) Henri Sivonen
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Pyry Kovanen
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] `navigator.getGamepads()` should return a `Promise` (#23) Ted Mielczarek
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) Ted Mielczarek
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Shift-JIS encoding/decoding support (#61) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/dom] Note that about:blank also results in quirks mode (#272) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Support Event.composed in Touch Events (#66) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) Ryosuke Niwa
• [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) Koji Ishii
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Dru Knox

Monday, 20 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) Dominic Cooney
• Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43) Chong Zhang
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Dave Herman
• Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Elliott Sprehn
• Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43) Chong Zhang
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Ian Kilpatrick
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Ian Kilpatrick
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Pass the original events or add events types in selectionchange (#65) Cyril Auburtin
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow expressions in addition to keyPaths when creating indexes (#33) Joshua Bell
• Re: [whatwg/dom] selectionchange possible improvements (#271) Cyril Auburtin
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Ian Kilpatrick
• Re: [whatwg/dom] selectionchange possible improvements (#271) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] selectionchange possible improvements (#271) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) smaug----
• [whatwg/encoding] EUK-kr encoding/decoding support (#62) r12a
• [whatwg/encoding] Shift-JIS encoding/decoding support (#61) r12a
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) Takayoshi Kochi
• [whatwg/encoding] ISO 2022-jp encoding/decoding support (#60) r12a
• [whatwg/encoding] EUC-jp encoding/decoding support (#59) r12a
• [whatwg/encoding] Big5 encoding/decoding support (#58) r12a
• [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) vanupam
• [whatwg/dom] selectionchange possible improvements (#271) Cyril Auburtin
• [whatwg/encoding] gb18030 encoding/decoding support (#57) r12a
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] GBK encoding/decoding support (#56) Anne van Kesteren
• [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) Tzviya
• [whatwg/encoding] GBK encoding/decoding support (#56) r12a
• Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) Andrea Marchesini
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Support Event.composed in Touch Events (#66) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) smaug----
• Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) smaug----
• Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) Andrea Marchesini
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) smaug----
• Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) Andrea Marchesini
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) Jake Archibald
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Figure out what to do with focusin/focusout (#88) smaug----
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) smaug----
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) smaug----
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Kris Siegel
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] When does the openWindow promise resolve? (#728) Anne van Kesteren
• [heycam/webidl] Use OrdinaryGetOwnProperty. (#131) Ms2ger
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) Anne van Kesteren
• [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) Koji Ishii
• [whatwg/storage] UI and origins <> origin groups (#34) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/storage] The term "site" is confusing (#32) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/url] Non-Windows-file URL definition (#128) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Anne van Kesteren
• [WICG/modality] Next steps? (#25) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Kris Siegel
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Kris Siegel
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Support Event.composed in Touch Events (#66) cynthia
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) Hayato Ito
• [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) Yehuda Katz
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTMLElement.prototype.offsetParent leaks a node inside a shadow tree (#497) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTMLElement.prototype.offsetParent leaks a node inside a shadow tree (#497) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• [w3c/touch-events] Support Event.composed in Touch Events (#66) Hayato Ito

Sunday, 19 June 2016

• Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) smaug----
• [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) smaug----
• [whatwg/url] Non-Windows-file URL definition (#128) JoeArizona
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Have single number type and allow custom ranges (#14) Tobie Langel
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Have single number type and allow custom ranges (#14) Tobie Langel

Saturday, 18 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Custom]: define registry primitive; ("namespace" support needed?) (bugzilla: 24578) (#154) Kevin Suttle
• Re: [heycam/webidl] "Restricted" Float32Array (#126) Tobie Langel
• Re: [heycam/webidl] "Restricted" Float32Array (#126) Tobie Langel
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Bug (sort of) (#98) Tobie Langel
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Bug (sort of) (#98) Tobie Langel
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] pointerlockchange and the accessibility tree (#1) Léonie Watson

Friday, 17 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/uievents] Probably remove 3.5 -- very redundant with HTML at the moment. (#90) Travis Leithead
• [w3c/uievents] Probably remove 3.5 -- very redundant with HTML at the moment. (#90) Travis Leithead
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Matt Falkenhagen
• [w3c/pointerlock] added a draft for CR revision (#2) Xiaoqian Wu
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] pointerlockchange and the accessibility tree (#1) chaals
• [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Significant normative and editorial updates (#16) Travis Leithead
• [whatwg/storage] eTLD -> public suffix? (#33) Timothy Guan-tin Chien
• [whatwg/storage] The term "site" is confusing (#32) Timothy Guan-tin Chien
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Remove the / -> : replacement from the File constructor (#41) Joshua Bell
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) Shashank Parekh
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) Shashank Parekh
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Make Attr a Node again (#102) Joey Smith

Thursday, 16 June 2016

• Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) aliams
• [w3c/FileAPI] Remove the / -> : replacement from the File constructor (#41) Ms2ger
• [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) Shashank Parekh
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and requestPointerLock() (#192) Vincent Scheib
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) Shashank Parekh
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) Ben Kelly
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) Shashank Parekh
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Service worker not working when tested on mobile using local ip. (#914) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Service worker not working when tested on mobile using local ip. (#914) Jake Archibald
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Service worker not working when tested on mobile using local ip. (#914) Shashank Parekh
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) Yves Lafon
• Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Update to the ES2017 signature of [[DefineOwnProperty]]. (#120) Cameron McCormack
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Update to the ES2017 signature of [[DefineOwnProperty]]. (#120) Cameron McCormack
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why does upgrade-an-element queue attribute, connected reactions before exiting early? (#523) Koji Ishii
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why does upgrade-an-element queue attribute, connected reactions before exiting early? (#523) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Boris Zbarsky
• [w3c/webcomponents] Why does upgrade-an-element queue attribute, connected reactions before exiting early? (#523) Dominic Cooney
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Dominic Cooney
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) Yves Lafon
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Clarify that the namespace check in "create an element" is redundant (#269) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Clarify that the namespace check in "create an element" is redundant (#269) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) Koji Ishii
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Dominic Cooney
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) Jake Archibald
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When to invoke custom element reactions that were enqueued outside of DOM operations? (#522) Koji Ishii
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When to invoke custom element reactions that were enqueued outside of DOM operations? (#522) Koji Ishii
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) isonmad

Wednesday, 15 June 2016

• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) Ben Kelly
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) Travis Leithead
• Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) Brandon Jones
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) Jake Archibald
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) Jake Archibald
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) chris van wiemeersch
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) Jake Archibald
• [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) Brandon Jones
• Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) Harald Alvestrand
• [w3c/gamepad] Added GamepadPose and GamepadCapabilities (#25) Brandon Jones
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When to invoke custom element reactions that were enqueued outside of DOM operations? (#522) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When to invoke custom element reactions that were enqueued outside of DOM operations? (#522) Koji Ishii
• [w3c/webcomponents] When to invoke custom element reactions that were enqueued outside of DOM operations? (#522) Koji Ishii
• [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) Koji Ishii
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Fix incumbent settings object handling (#128) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Fix incumbent settings object handling (#128) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) Koji Ishii

Tuesday, 14 June 2016

• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) wifiextender
• [whatwg/dom] Clarify that the namespace check in "create an element" is redundant (#269) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) Domenic Denicola
• [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) Koji Ishii
• Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] When does the openWindow promise resolve? (#728) Jungkee Song
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerContainer spec lists `onerror` as an event handler (#912) Ben Kelly
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) Mohamed Hafez
• [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) Martin Thomson
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Model HSTS and Upgrade-Insecure-Request as a redirect. (#324) Anne van Kesteren
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerContainer spec lists `onerror` as an event handler (#912) Tony Trinh
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] New Push API Capable of handling and/or matching Facebook Message and Apple iMessage (#911) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] New Push API Capable of handling and/or matching Facebook Message and Apple iMessage (#911) Jake Archibald
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Motion path spec (#66) Peter Linss
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] New Push API Capable of handling and/or matching Facebook Message and Apple iMessage (#911) Richard Maher
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Motion path spec (#66) shans

Monday, 13 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499) Trey Shugart
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Trey Shugart
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Ability to define Custom Element attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters for those attributes). (#517) Trey Shugart
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Motion path spec (#66) Peter Linss
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is or how can Shadow DOM be 'SEO friendly'? (#500) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] ARIA (#107) Brian Kardell
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is or how can Shadow DOM be 'SEO friendly'? (#500) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Enable an event listener to be invoked just once (#207) Chris Rebert
• [w3c/manifest] Allow unique start_url for subdomains (#470) Guilherme
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) jan-ivar
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) Chris Palmer
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Mihai Potra
• [whatwg/fetch] Model HSTS and Upgrade-Insecure-Request as a redirect. (#324) Mike West
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) Hayato Ito

Sunday, 12 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) Mohamed Hafez
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) Mohamed Hafez
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Zambonifofex
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Ability to define Custom Element attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters for those attributes). (#517) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Zambonifofex
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Sebastian Markbåge
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Zambonifofex
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Sebastian Markbåge
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Zambonifofex
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Zambonifofex
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Zambonifofex
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) Martin Thomson
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) Martin Thomson
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Zambonifofex
• [w3c/gamepad] Consider changing API to match SDL2's (#24) chris van wiemeersch
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) Mohamed Hafez
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) Zambonifofex
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) Zambonifofex

Saturday, 11 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) chaals
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) chaals
• [w3c/FileAPI] Streams is hot, FileReader.readAs____ is not (#40) Jimmy Karl Roland Wärting
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) Zambonifofex
• Re: [w3c/editing] Add a mechanism to opt-in/opt-out editing features (#93) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] should not use the shadow DOM for beforeInput (#76) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] should not use the shadow DOM for beforeInput (#76) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) Zambonifofex
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) chaals
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) Mohamed Hafez
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) JR Conlin
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Auto-retrying Webhook for re-subscribing in ServiceWorker (#197) Mohamed Hafez
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Auto-retrying Webhook for re-subscribing in ServiceWorker (#197) Mohamed Hafez
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) Mohamed Hafez
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) Mohamed Hafez

Friday, 10 June 2016

• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) I-Maps
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) Kit Cambridge
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Declarative syntax for custom elements (#136) Ryosuke Niwa
• [w3c/push-api] Auto-retrying webhook for re-subscribing in ServiceWorker (#197) Mohamed Hafez
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Declarative syntax for custom elements (#136) Zambonifofex
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) Zambonifofex
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Declarative syntax for custom elements (#136) Zambonifofex
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) roryhewitt
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Rob Dodson
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Rob Dodson
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) Zambonifofex
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Move service worker spec into w3c (#881) Yves Lafon
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/dom] Point out that initial about:blank also results in quirks mode (#268) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Ability to define Custom Element attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters for those attributes). (#517) Trey Shugart
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) Andy Earnshaw
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Léonie Watson
• Re: [w3c/push-api] The user agent should be permitted to acknowledge even if the SW rejects (#196) Michael van Ouwerkerk
• Re: [w3c/push-api] The user agent should be permitted to acknowledge even if the SW rejects (#196) Michael van Ouwerkerk
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Acknowledge messages that fail to decrypt (#195) Michael van Ouwerkerk
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Acknowledge messages that fail to decrypt (#195) Michael van Ouwerkerk
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Cannot scroll in IE11 while in fullscreen by Fullscreen API (#23) Kinna
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] no-referrer should not set referer header (#323) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [whatwg/streams] 3.11.4.3. respondWithNewView(view) references `chunk` (#467) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] 3.11.4.3. respondWithNewView(view) references `chunk` (#467) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] no-referrer should not set referer header (#323) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/fetch] no-referrer should not set referer header (#323) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Rob Dodson
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) jan-ivar
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Dominic Cooney
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) Mohamed Hafez
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) Martin Thomson
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) Mark Nottingham
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) Chris Palmer

Thursday, 9 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) Zambonifofex
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) roryhewitt
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Rob Dodson
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) Ryosuke Niwa
• [whatwg/streams] 3.11.4.3. respondWithNewView(view) references `chunk` (#467) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Acknowledge messages that fail to decrypt (#195) Martin Thomson
• Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [w3c/push-api] The user agent should be permitted to acknowledge even if the SW rejects (#196) Brian Raymor
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Enforce transaction commit ordering more strictly (#77) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Fix incumbent settings object handling (#128) Boris Zbarsky
• [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) Rob Dodson
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Preserve fragment in Request/Response URLs (#214) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make sure all responses have a URL list (#322) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Non-http fetch doesn't set response URL (#312) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make sure all responses have a URL list (#322) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous (or asynchronous) state probing on WritableStream (#463) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [w3c/push-api] The user agent should be permitted to acknowledge even if the SW rejects (#196) Michael van Ouwerkerk
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Acknowledge messages that fail to decrypt (#195) Michael van Ouwerkerk
• [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Preserve fragment in Request/Response URLs (#214) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make sure all responses have a URL list (#322) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make sure all responses have a URL list (#322) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make sure all responses have a URL list (#322) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/fetch] Make sure all responses have a URL list (#322) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Non-http fetch doesn't set response URL (#312) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] toggleEventListener (#251) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] toggleEventListener (#251) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Rename rootNode to getRootNode() and add composed argument (#248) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Rename rootNode to getRootNode() and add composed argument (#248) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Rename rootNode to getRootNode() and add composed argument (#248) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow delete() on index (#68) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) Daniel Appelquist
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) Jungkee Song
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) Jungkee Song
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow delete() on index (#68) beidson
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) beidson
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Why is delete() disallowed for key cursors? (#62) beidson
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) lostmsu
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow delete() on index (#68) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) aliams
• Re: [WICG/directory-upload] Security issue of directory upload: pretend to download when actaully to upload a directory (#38) Daniel Herr
• [WICG/directory-upload] Rename Suggested User Interface Element Text to "Choose folders" (#39) Daniel Herr
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Why is delete() disallowed for key cursors? (#62) aliams
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) Duan Yao
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow delete() on index (#68) aliams
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Jungkee Song
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Jungkee Song
• [w3c/push-api] The user agent should be permitted to acknowledge even if the SW rejects (#196) Martin Thomson
• [w3c/push-api] Acknowledge messages that fail to decrypt (#195) Martin Thomson
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) Ryosuke Niwa

Wednesday, 8 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) Daniel Appelquist
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Review FIDO spec (#97) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) Daniel Appelquist
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposal: allow subclasses of constructible built-ins to be constructed (#125) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposal: allow subclasses of constructible built-ins to be constructed (#125) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support batch cursors (#54) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support batch cursors (#54) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Rewindable cursors (#55) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Rewindable cursors (#55) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Enforce transaction commit ordering more strictly (#77) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support N-dimensional queries on indexes (#40) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support Files stored by reference (#56) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Why is delete() disallowed for key cursors? (#62) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow delete() on index (#68) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Joshua Bell
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Elliott Sprehn
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Elliott Sprehn
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) lostmsu
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) Travis Leithead
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Anne van Kesteren
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Expose fragments cross-origin for subresources (#910) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Elliott Sprehn
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Markup "synthetic events" term as a proper <dfn> (#254) Chris Rebert
• Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Markup "synthetic events" term as a proper <dfn> (#254) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) Andrew Betts
• Re: [whatwg/dom] UAs create elements in HTML namespace when context object is an HTML … (#267) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] UAs create elements in HTML namespace when context object is an HTML … (#267) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] .createElement's namespace handling doesn't seem to match what UAs do (#264) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) Paul Kinlan
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) Daniel Appelquist
• [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] I'm attending (#40) Léonie Watson
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Jungkee Song
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Jungkee Song
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Jake Archibald
• [w3c/WebPlatformWG] I'm attending (#40) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Give the UA permission to return anything it wants from query(). (#97) Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Describe the permission store using constraints instead of a full model. (#96) Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Describe the permission store using constraints instead of a full model. (#96) Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Give the UA permission to return anything it wants from query(). (#97) Martin Thomson
• Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update attendee list for the July SW meeting. (#39) chaals
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• [w3c/uievents] Support Event.composed (#89) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Markup "synthetic events" term as a proper <dfn> (#254) Chris Rebert
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Fire an event when push server connectivity changes (#194) Kit Cambridge
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Fire an event when push server connectivity changes (#194) Kit Cambridge
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) Ryosuke Niwa
• [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) Duan Yao
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) C. Scott Ananian
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3c/push-api] Fire an event when push server connectivity changes (#194) Martin Thomson
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) Travis Leithead
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) lostmsu
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) Trey Shugart
• Re: [w3c/editing] Add a mechanism to opt-in/opt-out editing features (#93) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] When should UA synthesize heights of an element? (#70) Johannes Wilm

Tuesday, 7 June 2016

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) Ben Kelly
• Re: [w3c/editing] should not use the shadow DOM for beforeInput (#76) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] inputType should be tied to the command names and having that tied to a way of declaring what you support (#110) Johannes Wilm
• [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) lostmsu
• Re: [w3c/editing] We need a new static range API (#91) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] We need a new static range API (#91) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Different ways to run a CFC? (#38) Michiel Bijl
• Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Different ways to run a CFC? (#38) John Schulz
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) C. Scott Ananian
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) C. Scott Ananian
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) Jan Miksovsky
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous (or asynchronous) state probing on WritableStream (#463) Domenic Denicola
• [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update attendee list for the July SW meeting. (#39) hober
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Preventing server-forced updates (#822) Andrew Sutherland
• [whatwg/dom] UAs create elements in HTML namespace when context object is an HTML … (#267) smaug----
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP-redirect-fetch preserves all pre-redirect headers for post-redirect request (#320) Josh Matthews
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP-redirect-fetch preserves all pre-redirect headers for post-redirect request (#320) Josh Matthews
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] openWindow with a WebApp manifests (#720) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Fix example of "undefined" custom element state (#266) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP-redirect-fetch preserves all pre-redirect headers for post-redirect request (#320) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP-redirect-fetch preserves all pre-redirect headers for post-redirect request (#320) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) Ilya Grigorik
• [whatwg/dom] Fix example of "undefined" custom element state (#266) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) Boris Zbarsky
• [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) Chris Dumez
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP-redirect-fetch preserves all pre-redirect headers for post-redirect request (#320) Josh Matthews
• [whatwg/fetch] HTTP-redirect-fetch preserves all pre-redirect headers for post-redirect request (#320) Josh Matthews
• Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) Chris Dumez
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Sort headers lexicographically in getAllResponseHeaders and combine values too (#50) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) Jungkee Song
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and requestPointerLock() (#192) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Should XHR store and send HTTP header names in lower case? (#34) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Consider adding HTML's 401 verbiage (#311) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Consider adding HTML's 401 verbiage (#311) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] same origin requests should allow credentials if credentials mode is sameorigin (#319) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] same origin requests should allow credentials if credentials mode is sameorigin (#319) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] same origin requests should allow credentials if credentials mode is sameorigin (#319) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] same origin requests should allow credentials if credentials mode is sameorigin (#319) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] "subresource" destination doesn't exist (#71) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] "subresource" destination doesn't exist (#71) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Takayoshi Kochi
• [whatwg/fetch] same origin requests should allow credentials if credentials mode is sameorigin (#319) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] autolink fix: Typo of concept-client-hints-list (#314) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] autolink fix: Typo of concept-client-hints-list (#314) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous (or asynchronous) state probing on WritableStream (#463) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove an unused variable (#318) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Meaningless stream variable assignment (#317) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove an unused variable (#318) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove an unused variable (#318) Yutaka Hirano
• [whatwg/fetch] Remove an unused variable (#318) Yutaka Hirano
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Meaningless stream variable assignment (#317) Yutaka Hirano
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous (or asynchronous) state probing on WritableStream (#463) Yutaka Hirano
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) Trey Shugart
• Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Rename rootNode to getRootNode() and add composed argument (#248) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Rename rootNode to getRootNode() and add composed argument (#248) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Link to definition of BufferSource (#316) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Repeatedly inserting a custom element may upgrade it twice (#261) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) Hayato Ito
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Authenticated PWA ? (#909) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Preventing server-forced updates (#822) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Installing a foreign SW as part of a subresource request (#825) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Allow preventing the update process to finish (#761) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Introduce `Service-Worker-Max-Age` header (#721) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) Hayato Ito
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Different ways to run a CFC? (#38) Marcos Cáceres
• [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) Jonas Sicking

Monday, 6 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) Chris Wilson
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Trey Shugart
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) Marcos Cáceres
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) Adam Klein
• Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) Rick Byers
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) Alex Russell
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) Dave Tapuska
• Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) Chris Dumez
• [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) Chris Dumez
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Step 4 of createContextualFragment is not enough (#15) Anthony Ramine
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) Travis Leithead
• [whatwg/dom] .createElement's namespace handling doesn't seem to match what UAs do (#264) smaug----
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) Anthony Ramine
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Step 4 of createContextualFragment is not enough (#15) ArkadiuszMichalski
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Till Schneidereit
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Never fail for navigation requests (#892) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider fetching service worker scripts with no-cache by default (#893) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] need AsyncLocalStorage (was #904) (#906) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] need AsyncLocalStorage (was #904) (#906) Jake Archibald
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) smaug----
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] what is the best way to save Request while offline ? (#904) Salvador de la Puente González
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] need AsyncLocalStorage (was #904) (#906) Salvador de la Puente González
• [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) C. Scott Ananian
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) C. Scott Ananian
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Step 4 of createContextualFragment is not enough (#15) Guillaume Gomez
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Step 4 of createContextualFragment is not enough (#15) Ms2ger
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Step 4 of createContextualFragment is not enough (#15) Anthony Ramine
• [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Step 4 of createContextualFragment is not enough (#15) Anthony Ramine
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) Anthony Ramine
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) Anthony Ramine
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) Anthony Ramine
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Is is possible to read the response before the whole request body is sent? (#315) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Is is possible to read the response before the whole request body is sent? (#315) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/fetch] Meaningless stream variable assignment (#317) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) Steven Lambert
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) Ben
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Is is possible to read the response before the whole request body is sent? (#315) Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 5 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) Erik Isaksen
• [w3c/push-api] Fire an event when push server connectivity changes (#194) Kit Cambridge
• Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) ArkadiuszMichalski
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) Jon Walsh
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Authenticated PWA ? (#909) liebrand
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) Jon Walsh
• [whatwg/fetch] Link to definition of BufferSource (#316) isonmad

Saturday, 4 June 2016

• Re: [whatwg/streams] Should consumers of readers/streams be notified why a stream was canceled? (#448) jplaisted
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Should consumers of readers/streams be notified why a stream was canceled? (#448) jplaisted
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) Ben Kelly
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Is is possible to read the response before the whole request body is sent? (#315) Rafał Ruciński
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Is is possible to read the response before the whole request body is sent? (#315) Jake Archibald
• [whatwg/fetch] Is is possible to read the response before the whole request body is sent? (#315) Rafał Ruciński
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] why cant i register a embedded function as for shared worker? (#902) publicocean0
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] why cant i register a embedded function as for shared worker? (#902) Andrew Sutherland
• Re: [w3c/editing] Cancelable attribute should be removed from the spec because it already referenced in Event.idl (#100) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] We should update the spec with an ImmutableStaticRange that is a subset of the Range interface and return them via the getTargetRanges method. s/ImmutableStaticRange/StaticRange/ in the actual spec (#104) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] We should update the spec with an ImmutableStaticRange that is a subset of the Range interface and return them via the getTargetRanges method. s/ImmutableStaticRange/StaticRange/ in the actual spec (#104) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [w3c/editing] [beforeinput] Should we allow canceling the committed text from IME? (#128) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] why cant i register a embedded function as for shared worker? (#902) publicocean0
• Re: [w3c/editing] New API: Selection#makeVisible() (#129) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) Jon Walsh
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) Jon Walsh
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) C. Scott Ananian
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Domenic Denicola

Friday, 3 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) Ryosuke Niwa
• [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Domenic Denicola
• [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Apply serialization algorithm fixes based on testing (#14) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Document serialization steps are wrong (#11) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Fix document serialization (#13) Travis Leithead
• [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Fix document serialization (#13) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) Travis Leithead
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) Ilya Grigorik
• [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) Travis Leithead
• [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Document serialization steps are wrong (#11) Travis Leithead
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) Ilya Grigorik
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Auto-cache imported scripts (#908) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Auto-cache imported scripts (#908) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Auto-cache imported scripts (#908) Marijn Kruisselbrink
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] potential http cache issues with importScripts() (#894) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] potential http cache issues with importScripts() (#894) Jake Archibald
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) Pedram Emrouznejad
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) jan-ivar
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) Steven Lambert
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Auto-cache imported scripts (#908) Jake Archibald
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Editorial refactoring (#10) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Expose ticks in wheel events (#17) Iván Sánchez Ortega
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Test suite link doesn't link to all the relevant tests (#3) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Test suite link doesn't link to all the relevant tests (#3) Travis Leithead
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Trim unused Respec configuration flags; add additional test suite links (#9) Travis Leithead
• [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Editorial refactoring (#10) Travis Leithead
• [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Trim unused Respec configuration flags; add additional test suite links (#9) Travis Leithead
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) Erik Isaksen
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] autolink fix: Typo of concept-client-hints-list (#314) Takeshi Yoshino
• [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Different ways to run a CFC? (#38) Léonie Watson
• [whatwg/fetch] autolink fix: Typo of concept-client-hints-list (#314) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) Ben Kelly
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) Jake Archibald
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Expose ticks in wheel events (#17) Rick Byers
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) Jake Archibald
• [w3c/workers] service worker enprovements (#4) publicocean0
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) Jon Walsh
• [w3c/workers] shared worker bugs/missing parts (#3) publicocean0
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) Jon Walsh
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) chaals
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Dominic Cooney
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Non-http fetch doesn't set response URL (#312) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Non-http fetch doesn't set response URL (#312) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) jan-ivar
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Save the is="" value an element was created with (#262) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Secure Client-Subscribed 1:M Broadcast message delivery (#901) Richard Maher
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) Hayato Ito
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) Mark Nottingham
• [heycam/webidl] Fix incumbent settings object handling (#128) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) Joseph Orbegoso Pea
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) (#122) Andrew Betts
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) Andrew Betts
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) raymeskhoury
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) Pedram Emrouznejad
• [whatwg/storage] Exposing cross-origin resource size (#31) Tom Van Goethem
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Ryosuke Niwa

Thursday, 2 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Ryosuke Niwa
• [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) Ryosuke Niwa
• [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) aliams
• Re: [whatwg/streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) isonmad
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) beidson
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) jan-ivar
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Secure Client-Subscribed 1:M Broadcast message delivery (#901) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Secure Client-Subscribed 1:M Broadcast message delivery (#901) Jake Archibald
• Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Allow waitUntil to be called multiple times, async (#771) Jungkee Song
• [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) Paul Kinlan
• [whatwg/fetch] Non-http fetch doesn't set response URL (#312) Manish Goregaokar
• [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) Daniel Appelquist
• [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) (#122) Daniel Appelquist
• [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Make ServiceWorkers more tailored for "always offline" websites (#907) toriningen
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) jan-ivar
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] CSP (#42) Mark Nottingham
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] CSP (#42) Mark Nottingham
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) Dominick Ng
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) Dominick Ng
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [whatwg/streams] light weight transformations (#461) Dominic Tarr
• [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) Dominick Ng

Wednesday, 1 June 2016

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) chaals
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Daniel Murphy
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) Pedram Emrouznejad
• Re: [whatwg/streams] light weight transformations (#461) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous queue draining for WritableStream (#465) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] URNbis documents (#117) Daniel Appelquist
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous (or asynchronous) state probing on WritableStream (#463) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) jan-ivar
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) chaals
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] CSP (#42) Daniel Appelquist
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse events/click note to specify these are usually only fired for tap (#63) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) Matt N.
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Daniel Murphy
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Daniel Murphy
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) jan-ivar
• [whatwg/dom] Save the is="" value an element was created with (#262) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] WebUSB (#108) Owen Campbell-Moore
• [whatwg/streams] tighten ReadableStreamReaderGenericRelease assertion (#466) Ben Kelly
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) chaals
• [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) Steven Lambert
• [whatwg/fetch] Consider adding HTML's 401 verbiage (#311) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] light weight transformations (#461) Takeshi Yoshino
• [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: avoid upsetting lazy compilers (#55) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Group constants together in half-width math (#49) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Group constants together in half-width math (#49) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: Exclude index entries instead of just pointers (#51) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/xhr] "subresource" destination doesn't exist (#71) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Edititorial: Add a note about duplicates to "index Shift_JIS pointer" (#50) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Handle EUDC before the index in Shift_JIS (#54) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/encoding] Handle EUDC before the index in Shift_JIS (#54) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Please double-check the end of the EUDC range (#53) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Use HTML's 'document base URL' concept. (#258) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Use HTML's 'document base URL' concept. (#258) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Un-customify adopted elements (#260) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Don't set custom element state redundantly (#253) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Don't set custom element state redundantly (#253) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Anne van Kesteren
• [whatwg/encoding] Please double-check the end of the EUDC range (#53) Henri Sivonen
• [whatwg/encoding] Editorial optimization: Move EUDC before index lookup (#52) Henri Sivonen
• [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: Exclude index entries instead of just pointers (#51) Henri Sivonen
• [whatwg/encoding] Edititorial: Add a note about duplicates to "index Shift_JIS pointer" (#50) Henri Sivonen
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] index-jis0208.txt should be JIS X 0208 and add another index file (#47) Henri Sivonen
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Grammar change: "that is check" to that checks" (#310) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Grammar change: "that is check" to that checks" (#310) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Bevis Tseng
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous queue draining for WritableStream (#465) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) Takeshi Yoshino
• [whatwg/streams] Synchronous queue draining for WritableStream (#465) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and requestPointerLock(), fullscreenElement (#192) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] flatten: true in assignedNodes doesn't make much sense when a slot doesn't have display: contents (#493) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] flatten: true in assignedNodes doesn't make much sense when a slot doesn't have display: contents (#493) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTMLElement.prototype.offsetParent leaks a node inside a shadow tree (#497) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) Joshua Bell
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] What happens in these slot/content scenarios? (#508) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] What happens in these slot/content scenarios? (#508) Hayato Ito
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) Trey Shugart
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Repeatedly inserting a custom element may upgrade it twice (#261) Domenic Denicola
• [whatwg/dom] Repeatedly inserting a custom element may upgrade it twice (#261) Dominic Cooney
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) Pedram Emrouznejad
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Why can't Node's nodeValue use [TreatNullAs=EmptyString]? (#259) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Why can't Node's nodeValue use [TreatNullAs=EmptyString]? (#259) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Why can't Node's nodeValue use [TreatNullAs=EmptyString]? (#259) ArkadiuszMichalski
• Re: [whatwg/streams] light weight transformations (#461) Dominic Tarr
• Re: [whatwg/streams] light weight transformations (#461) Dominic Tarr
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] What happens in these slot/content scenarios? (#508) Trey Shugart
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) Pedram Emrouznejad

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:22:41 UTC