- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 03:00:42 -0700
- To: whatwg/storage <storage@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/storage/pull/36/r72769471@github.com>
> > <p class="note">When granted to an <a>origin</a>, the persistence permission can be used to protect > storage from the user agent's clearing policies. The user agent cannot clear storage marked as > persistent without involvement from the <a>origin</a> or user. This makes it particularly useful for > resources the user needs to have available while offline or resources the user creates locally. > > -<p class="XXX">We will eventually integrate with the Permissions API, with the identifier > -"<dfn export for=PermissionName type=enum-value><code>persistent-storage</code></dfn>", but since > -that specification is not in great shape at the moment that has not happened yet. > +The <dfn for="PermissionName" enum-value>"<code>persistent-storage</code>"</dfn> <a>powerful feature</a>'s > +permission-related flags, algorithms, and types are defaulted, except for: > + > +<dl> > + <dt><a>permission state</a></dt> > + <dd><code>{name: {{"persistent-storage"}}}</code>'s <a>permission state</a> must have the same > + value for all <a>environment settings objects</a> with a given <a>origin</a>.</dd> But we do define creation of a settings object. At that point the origin is set, too. The statement we have here around "permission state" is somewhat declarative and doesn't directly fall out from something else. Does that make sense? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/36/files/52d4bac9ccc42d0307989cf262fbbb7094403340#r72769471
Received on Friday, 29 July 2016 10:01:17 UTC