- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 01:44:07 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 25 July 2016 08:44:39 UTC
The use case sounds reasonable here, and I'd expect there would be more such needs in future. Basically, I don't think we want to change the base rule that requests initiated from a service worker won't go through a service worker by default. So, I believe we need an optional parameter to fetch that'd override this behavior. @annevk, maybe we'll need to discuss more on this in line with the https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/322 where we try to move the active worker definition to Document/WorkerGlobalScope. I remember you sort of proposed replacing the skip-service-worker flag with using the active worker internal slot of a request's client or something like that? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/303#issuecomment-234890200
Received on Monday, 25 July 2016 08:44:39 UTC