Re: [whatwg/storage] Integrate with the Permissions spec. (#36)

>  
>  <p class="note">When granted to an <a>origin</a>, the persistence permission can be used to protect
>  storage from the user agent's clearing policies. The user agent cannot clear storage marked as
>  persistent without involvement from the <a>origin</a> or user. This makes it particularly useful for
>  resources the user needs to have available while offline or resources the user creates locally.
>  
> -<p class="XXX">We will eventually integrate with the Permissions API, with the identifier
> -"<dfn export for=PermissionName type=enum-value><code>persistent-storage</code></dfn>", but since
> -that specification is not in great shape at the moment that has not happened yet.
> +The <dfn for="PermissionName" enum-value>"persistent-storage"</dfn> <a>powerful feature</a>'s
> +permission-related flags, algorithms, and types are defaulted except for:

Sigh, I don't disagree, but I also think "`test`" is much more readable than "test". The prevailing style was also "`test`" I think until @tabatkins introduced this different style of formatting.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/36/files/86a18c644f5ab19df446e9ce181e53f5ba1962b6#r71914761