Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should parser extensibility be a design goal? (#113)

I still think it's _realistic_... I don't know if there's appetite for it.

@dominiccooney @rniwa @travisleithead @smaug---- what do you think of the idea (as a "custom elements v2" future feature) of modifying the parser so that `<x-foo! attrs>`  parses as a void element, for any custom element name `x-foo`?

Does it sound doable and reasonable, or is modifying the parser in such a way a bad idea that you never endorse?

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/113#issuecomment-234260721