- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:56:22 -0700
- To: w3ctag/spec-reviews <spec-reviews@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 23:56:56 UTC
And also to clarify, I'd updated my comment after @domenic started replying (hence, my text and his quote differ). Cursors need a pull-type model, which is indeed a better fit for async iterators. The proposal at https://github.com/inexorabletash/indexeddb-promises shows how cursors+promises already get a non-terrible syntax with the rest of the proposal (search for "fetch all keys in a range using a cursor") but aligning that with async iterators makes sense. I've got @littledan nearby if I have questions. (And feedback on that repo is welcome) ... So... is there anything actionable here or should I close out this issue? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/84#issuecomment-234119213
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 23:56:56 UTC