Re: [whatwg/fetch] Possible typo in header value definition (#332)

Thank you for reporting this. I suspect it's a duplicate of either #213 or #115. Clearly something is wrong here. I also didn't know errata was filed for this particular production so thanks for pointing that out too.

@hiroshige-g have you looked into this since February? Should we just go back to what we had before HTTP was revised? Or at least something that means the same. This new production has just led to flurry of issues.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/332#issuecomment-233590324

Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2016 10:18:43 UTC