- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:17:35 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 15 July 2016 18:18:02 UTC
> @domenic it's hard to tell from the diff; does this PR update http://heycam.github.io/webidl/#dfn-named-definition ? Yes > Also, does it update the ... language in http://heycam.github.io/webidl/#idl-names ? Nope, missed that one. Pushed a rebased and squashed commit with that included. --- The larger question we have before merging and using this for Console is what to do about the fact that console, for legacy reasons, needs an empty [[Prototype]] between it and Object.prototype. - Do we build that into the definition of namespaces? (Hopefully not) - Do we create an in-IDL way of expressing that one-off situation, say an extended attribute? - Do we let the console spec add an exotic binding-level requirement that transcends Web IDL? If I had some guidance on that I think we'd be ready to merge and use this... --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/121#issuecomment-233027857
Received on Friday, 15 July 2016 18:18:02 UTC