- From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:56:32 -0700
- To: w3c/push-api <push-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2016 00:57:05 UTC
Presumably, if the UA doesn't support member X, then it can omit X from `PushSubscription.options`. Given that the most obvious use for that is to pass it back to the UA, then not having X will be functionally equivalent (since the UA would ignore X even if it is present). Even if it did retain X, there would be no harm other than muddying the situation: applications wouldn't be able to work out what was supported vs. not. > I would very much like to see this for notifications too: exposing properties based on availability of the feature on the user's host platform. Yes, feature detection is a basic right :) --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/push-api/issues/200#issuecomment-232528647
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2016 00:57:05 UTC