Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839)

@jakearchibald Can you remind me why we don't just check importScripts() for byte changes as well?  I seem to recall it was since importScripts could be called async way back when, but now we've made that throw.  Since we only allow sync importScripts maybe we can just include it in the byte check.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/839#issuecomment-231534253

Received on Saturday, 9 July 2016 13:24:11 UTC