Re: [whatwg/url] Add non-special-URL hosts (#185)

Yeah, you are right. Even with EOF you get a path that is non-empty.

Another problem here is not forbidding certain code points in the host setter.

I guess I should rethink this.

The other question of course is whether all this additional complexity is worth it, versus treating non-special schemes as just having a path and not being able to be base URLs for each other. (Which is what most browsers implement at the moment.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/pull/185#issuecomment-269763463

Received on Friday, 30 December 2016 11:56:17 UTC