- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:03:37 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2016 16:04:17 UTC
I think there might be an alternate way of implementing this, and of implementing the non-interruptibility of close/write, which is to leverage the [[queue]] more. In that formulation, abort() would clear the queue and then put an "abort" item in the queue, instead of its current behavior of immediately transitioning to the error state---which causes a number of strange things to happen. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/634#issuecomment-268560253
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2016 16:04:17 UTC