- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 04:27:36 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/425/review/13541999@github.com>
annevk commented on this pull request. > - <var>request</var> is reused with redirects, authentication, and proxy authentication. + <ol> + <li><p>Set <var>httpRequest</var> to a copy of <var>request</var> except for its + <a for=request>body</a>. + + <li><p>Let <var>body</var> be <var>request</var>'s <a for=request>body</a>. + + <li> + <p>If <var>body</var> is non-null, then set <var>request</var>'s <a for=request>body</a> to a + new <a for=/>body</a> whose <a for=body>stream</a> is null and whose <a for=body>source</a> is + <var>body</var>'s <a for=body>source</a>. + + <p class="note no-backref">Here we do not <a for=request>clone</a> <var>request</var> in order + to reduce memory consumption. <var>request</var> can be reused with redirects, authentication, + and proxy authentication. + </ol> This still seems wrong. Shouldn't we be setting _httpRequest_'s body rather than that of _request_? Also, what happens to _request_'s body? The note should probably also move to after the `</ol>` closing tag. We copy and move body around to preserve memory consumption. And we copy in the first place since it needs to be possible to add headers without affecting _request_, as _request_ is reused with redirects et al. It seems you dropped part of that note, but we should keep that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/425#pullrequestreview-13541999
Received on Monday, 19 December 2016 12:28:07 UTC