Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Consider mechanisms to bypass the service worker for things that we know won't be in it's cache (#1026) from Jake Archibald on 2016-12-16 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from December 2016)

From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 06:30:24 -0800
To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1026/267605645@github.com>

But yeah, I think @n8schloss is looking for something declarative.

**$TATIC ROUTEZ**

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1026#issuecomment-267605645

Received on Friday, 16 December 2016 14:30:56 UTC