- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:52:11 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 16 December 2016 08:52:43 UTC
annevk commented on this pull request. > @@ -3049,6 +3055,17 @@ in addition to <a>HTTP fetch</a> above. to `<code>GET</code>` and <var>request</var>'s <a for=request>body</a> to null. + <li> + <p>If <var>request</var>'s <a for=request>body</a> is non-null, then set <var>request</var>'s + <a for=request>body</a> to the first part of <a lt=extract for=BodyInit>extracting</a> + <var>request</var>'s <a for=request>body</a>'s <a for=body>source</a>. I'm still a little confused by the new proposed setup. Now body can have a source, but body itself can also be a byte sequence? I'm not sure that makes sense. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/425#pullrequestreview-13293351
Received on Friday, 16 December 2016 08:52:43 UTC