Re: [w3c/manifest] Add support for 'serviceworkers' member (#507)

kenchris commented on this pull request.



> +            <ol>
+              <li>If <var>type</var> is not "<code>undefined</code>", issue a
+              developer warning that the type is unsupported.
+              </li>
+              <li>Return <code>"classic"</code>.
+              </li>
+            </ol>
+          </li>
+          <li>If <a>Trim</a>(value) is the empty string, then:
+            <ol>
+              <li>Issue a developer warning that the type is unsupported.
+              </li>
+              <li>Return <code>undefined</code>.
+              </li>
+            </ol>
+          <li>Return <var>type</var>.

We have <li>Let <var>type</var> be <a>Type</a>(<var>value</var>). above. That is how @marcoscaceres did it elsewhere. I think that should be fine. Why the value.[[Value]]? looks like a private slot

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/507