Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Consider mechanisms to bypass the service worker for things that we know won't be in it's cache (#1026)

Sounds like another use case solved by Jake's static routing proposal:

https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/920#issuecomment-229016073

I do wonder how much headroom there is for this kind of optimization, though.  At some point we are going to bottleneck on the main thread or limits on parallel network requests.  That limits how much of a win we can get with something like this.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1026#issuecomment-266885466