- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 14:08:56 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 22:09:29 UTC
In the end the goal would be to have the same observable semantics as the current spec + your 3, but just less contortions to wrap a Web IDL object around a backing JS map and then operate on it with the original value of various methods and such. Maybe I'm the only one who thinks the wrapping setup is weird though. Not a high priority to fix. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/254#issuecomment-266568681
Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 22:09:29 UTC