- From: Marijn Kruisselbrink <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 09:45:50 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 17:46:53 UTC
>> does it solve your concerns if we add a new client type of "serviceworker"? > > Well, it seems we should do that for foreign fetch anyway. So that is ok. There has been discussions about whether foreign fetch should expose client IDs (w3c/ServiceWorker#1017), but I'm not aware of any proposals to have actual `Client` objects you can look up for these IDs. So not sure we really need a new client type for that use case. It do think it seems reasonable to add such a client type for this. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/303#issuecomment-266499415
Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 17:46:53 UTC