- From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 09:05:23 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 17:26:21 UTC
> does it solve your concerns if we add a new client type of "serviceworker"? Well, it seems we should do that for foreign fetch anyway. So that is ok. What protections will we have to prevent a SW from keeping itself alive infinitely via fetch events if it can generate its own fetch event? We must provide some keep-alive budget so that work can be done, but we don't want this to be a way to persist the SW in memory for long periods. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/303#issuecomment-266488164
Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 17:26:21 UTC