Re: [heycam/webidl] Should perform security check for constructors (#249)

Oops, thanks for correcting the test case.

> Perform a security check on what?

I don't know. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how these things work. Per your comment above and https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/361#issuecomment-265814366 I take it that the security check wouldn't make sense for constructors, but active document check makes sense. But not for all constructors. `Date` or `Image` are not problematic for example. OK. Let's close this and discuss `PaymentRequest` in the other issue.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/249#issuecomment-265873556

Received on Thursday, 8 December 2016 22:22:30 UTC