Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509)

> OK so if I want to join the party of coolaid drinkers then it's OK to comment, but otherwise be quiet?

no, you made your single use case "*CE are good enough*" point, and never been able to answer all other problems already solved, and please let me underline **already** thanks to polyfills, bu builtins extends.

You are in the same list of browser vendors that complains about `is=""` attribute and never provided an alternative.

We all got your point, which is restated over and over, and it keeps ignoring all counter-points that invalidate the "_good enough_" argument.

Do you have a proposal to fix and cover what `is=""` attribute does already?

Yes? **Please share!**

No? Please stop making noise in this thread.

Thank you!



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/509#issuecomment-265309832