- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:54:24 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/pull/155/r77088360@github.com>
> + not the appropriate global object.) > + > + <!-- https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18547#c9 --> > + </li> > + > + <li>Otherwise, set <var>O</var> to the <span class='esvalue'>this</span> > + value.</li> > + > + <li>If <var>O</var> is a <a class='dfnref' > + href='#dfn-platform-object'>platform object</a>, then <a class='dfnref' > + href='#dfn-perform-a-security-check'>perform a security check</a>, > + passing <var>O</var>, <var>realm</var>, <var>id</var>, and "method".</li> > + > + <li>If <var>O</var> is not a <a class='dfnref' > + href='#dfn-platform-object'>platform object</a> that implements the > + interface <var>target</var>, <a href='#ecmascript-throw' class='dfnref I think that wording (from the current spec) is just broken for unforgeable operations. I'm trying to figure out a way to phrase this, but despite all the phrases like "supplemental interface" and "consequential interface" I can't actually see a term for "the actual not-mixin interface where this is headed for". Ideas appreciated. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/155/files/5f3f6f66bb2d8cfbf1c7197e64f2b54f9cdd2845#r77088360
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2016 22:55:02 UTC