Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Review of WakeLock API and suitability for overall platform requested by 31 August 2016 (#126) from Daniel Appelquist on 2016-08-31 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from August 2016)

From: Daniel Appelquist <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:11:45 -0700
To: w3ctag/spec-reviews <spec-reviews@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/126/243918635@github.com>

Discussed on [31-aug-2016 call](https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/blob/gh-pages/2016/telecons/08-31-agenda.md) in context of [pointer lock API](https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/PR-pointerlock-20160830/)... is there a lack of consistency?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/126#issuecomment-243918635

Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2016 22:12:18 UTC