- From: Russell Bicknell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:58:03 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/320@github.com>
(Some discussion on this already happened in #309.)
https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-node-comparedocumentposition
`compareDocumentPosition` should be able to compare nodes with different roots if those nodes have the same shadow-including root and the user indicates they would like to compare using the composed tree.
Consider:
```html
<div>
<!-- ShadowRoot -->
<slot></slot>
<div id="A"></div>
<!-- /ShadowRoot -->
<div id="B"></div>
</div>
```
which composes to something 'like':
```html
<div>
<!-- ShadowRoot -->
<slot>
<div id="B"></div>
</slot>
<div id="A"></div>
<!-- /ShadowRoot -->
</div>
```
`A.compareDocumentPosition(B, {composed: true});`, or something similar, should return `DOCUMENT_POSITION_PRECEDING`.
A strange situation this brings up is how fallback content of a slot compare to other nodes in the same shadow-including root when that slot has assigned nodes. IMHO, when comparing using the composed tree, the slot's fallback content should be considered disconnected.
Also, given that a ShadowRoot doesn't have a natural position in its host's tree (or relative to its host's descendants - it's not a special child) without composition, I think step 6 in the specced behavior should continue to apply if no explicit opt-in is indicated.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/320
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2016 22:58:32 UTC