- From: Vincent Scheib <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:47:23 -0700
- To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/pointerlock/pull/8/c243317961@github.com>
DOM spec has unnatural English grammar, Example from that spec that make sense: "Run the *retargeting steps* with event" But this doesn't: "Let relatedTarget be the result of invoking *retargeting* event’s relatedTarget against target if event’s relatedTarget is non-null, and null otherwise" It would make sense as: "Let relatedTarget be the result of *retargeting* event’s relatedTarget against target if event’s relatedTarget is non-null, and null otherwise" "Let relatedTarget be the result of invoking *retarget* on event’s relatedTarget against target if event’s relatedTarget is non-null, and null otherwise" "Let relatedTarget be the result of invoking *retarget* against target with event’s relatedTarget if it is non-null, and null otherwise" So, for Pointer Lock I would suggest: "returns the result of *retargeting* with the context object..." On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Takayoshi Kochi <notifications@github.com> wrote: > @scheib <https://github.com/scheib> Could you take a look? > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/8#issuecomment-243313438>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXnm2eVtSm-FEPmMi4v9hOIXIPycFAzks5qk5H5gaJpZM4JvW11> > . > -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/8#issuecomment-243317961
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2016 02:47:59 UTC