Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756)

> 6. Require `controller !== reg.pushManager.active !== reg.sync.active`.

If the spec is open, I think the wording should be "Does not require to `controller !== reg.pushManager.active !== reg.sync.active`." Because it could be but it is not mandatory, isn't it?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/756#issuecomment-243214104