Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: integrate more explicitly with IDL for callbacks (#315)

> @@ -8715,10 +8706,9 @@ these steps:
>   <!-- !((1 << (node.nodeType - 1)) & whatToShow) -->
>   <li>If <a for=traversal>filter</a> is null,
>   return {{NodeFilter/FILTER_ACCEPT}}.
> - <li>Let <var>result</var> be the return value of calling
> - <a for=traversal>filter</a>'s
> - {{NodeFilter/acceptNode()}} with <var>node</var> as
> - argument. Rethrow any exceptions.
> + <li>Let <var>result</var> be the return value of <a>call a user object's operation</a> with
> + <a for=traversal>filter</a>, "<code>acceptNode</code>", and a list of arguments consisting of

I'd keep this as `{{NodeFilter/acceptNode()}}` instead of `"<code>acceptNode</code>"`, seems nicer.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/315/files/15804f5d5f856c672aae002e3671dd722c632b20#r76449843