- From: Jeffrey Yasskin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:00:23 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 26 August 2016 16:03:35 UTC
For @marcoscaceres, WebIDL doesn't define the "underlying ECMAScript object" operation that our functions rely on. Dictionaries are [passed as copies](http://heycam.github.io/webidl/#es-dictionary), as @jan-ivar said, so we'd need to store an extra link in WebIDL to even make it possible. But it's not a big change to use `object` instead. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/42#issuecomment-242776275
Received on Friday, 26 August 2016 16:03:35 UTC