Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920)

Yes, sure, I agree with @ykahlon on the service worker being the ultimate responsible for handling the request and with @n8schloss about not routing, this API proposal was shaped to allow adding routes at some point in the future. I'm fine with a declarative API too as [proposed by @NekR](https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/920#issuecomment-241153009).

The thing I don't understand is the need of the `RequestStorage` (perhaps I'm missing some scenario) and I would prefer to make the preflight by _route_ (actually by prefix) to not reach the network in not critic requests.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/920#issuecomment-241972467

Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2016 06:47:25 UTC