- From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:44:54 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 14:46:00 UTC
> Well, the original proposal of the SW acting as its own client, with some APIs opting out of that, would essentially give you that. The service worker holds itself alive as a Client? That sounds extremely leak prone. If we really want to go the route of no client, but its still a subresource load (ignoring that subresource implies its a sub- of a client), then I'd suggest we: 1) Distill out the concepts from the client subresource interception into a new concept. 2) Re-write current subresource loads to use that new concept. 3) Write notifications to use the new concept as well. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/303#issuecomment-238889385
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 14:46:00 UTC