- From: James M Snell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 10:08:46 -0700
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/url/issues/136/238034093@github.com>
OK. One thing to keep in mind is that we are currently looking at adding WHATWG URL parsing to core currently as an experimental new feature. There is an open pr but I don't have the link immediately handy. On Saturday, August 6, 2016, Steven Vachon <notifications@github.com> wrote: > I think it's fine, actually, that we don't parse relative URLs. The only > downside is backwards-compatibility with Node's url.parse(). I'm writing > specurl <https://github.com/stevenvachon/specurl>—which builds on > whatwg-url <https://npmjs.com/whatwg-url>—in an attempt to replace Node's > url, even if only in user land. Let me know if you have any > thoughts/ideas. > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/136#issuecomment-238033801>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAa2eeuR7wXXfyyIyyeziDJF8u88HjjUks5qdL5RgaJpZM4JeG7c> > . > --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/136#issuecomment-238034093
Received on Saturday, 6 August 2016 17:09:30 UTC