- From: Jeffrey Yasskin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 12:53:04 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 5 August 2016 19:59:57 UTC
Mhmm, in the case at hand, I happen not to write out any literal arrays, but if I had, I wouldn't intend the page's `%ArrayIteratorPrototype%.next` to be used to create the `sequence<>` object. In most cases, I'd intend only the initial values of the various ES objects to be used, but there are probably some cases where I'd want member access on a user-provided object to use the user's overrides. I don't really care what syntax we use for WebIDL literals, as long as it's nearly as concise as the ES syntax. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/142#issuecomment-237946750
Received on Friday, 5 August 2016 19:59:57 UTC