Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756)

I think so, but I'd have to try it to be certain.  It sounds promising, assuming I can keep the SharedWorker alive long enough when a background sync event has triggered.  It has to do a fair amount of async IDB work, but there's no setTimeouts involved.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/756#issuecomment-237890175