Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756)

@wanderview Thank you for taking the time to explain that.  Makes more sense now.

Follow-up question:  I've used patterns in the past of "hanging" a service worker mid-lifecycle with event.waitUntil until "things" happen (some record appears in IndexedDB, a message from the client... see https://github.com/bkimmel/bkimmel.github.io/blob/master/serviceworker_bgs/sw.js ).  It seems like if there were multiple SWs running, those wouldn't really be "usable" patterns anymore, right?  Not  a huge deal: I don't have anything in production doing that, but I guess this concurrent stuff would mean I'd have to think about those sort of creative applications a little bit differently, right?

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/756#issuecomment-237866863

Received on Friday, 5 August 2016 14:35:05 UTC