Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible run-to-completion violation in "Handle Service Worker Client Unload" (#746)

Before the f2f on this Tue, I'm trying to sort out my thoughts on this. @nikhilm's original suggestion basically makes sense so it would be:

- Register algorithm unset the uninstalling flag (without any condition)
- `update()` will return early (as-is)
- Soft Update algorithm will not unset the flag (naturally as it’s moved to Register)

The only question myself as of now is the second item: `update()` should block uninstalling a registration and go ahead with an update instead?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/746#issuecomment-150904985

Received on Sunday, 25 October 2015 09:30:26 UTC