Re: [webidl] Add a [SecureContext] operator attribute (#65)

Thanks, @bzbarsky. This is exactly what I needed. :) I've uploaded a second pass at the patch, and I hope you'll indulge a few more newbie questions.

1. I think it makes sense to perform this check at more or less the same time we're performing "a security check", and to use the incumbent settings object, as I think we ought to care about the context that's using a tool to do some work, rather than the context from which the tool came. Does that make sense?

(As an aside: WebIDL refers to "incumbent script" and "stack of incumbent scripts". Those ought to be renamed to "[stack of] incumbent settings object", right? I can throw you a patch if that's accurate.)

2. Should I leave the descriptive text in the `[SecureContext]` section? Or is the normative description in the operations section good enough?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/65#issuecomment-148639968