Re: [webidl] add a type to represent the undefined value (#60)

Ideally like nullability we have undefinability. This could even replace the optional argument syntax. Using `[` and `]` is somewhat attractive as that's already a convention of sorts, but that clashes badly with extended attributes.

(Looking at JavaScript proper perhaps nullability ought to be the special case and undefinability ought to use `?`...)

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/60#issuecomment-146078443