Re: [ServiceWorker] Make secure context requirements more explicit (#754)

>From https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=489670

@mikewest

> This is expected behavior, as per https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/powerfulfeatures/#settings-secure.
>
> We didn't do this for WebCrypto, and the result was Netflix writing a 1:1 postMessage-based wrapper. That's not something we can support while maintaining the guarantees that locking an API to HTTPS is supposed to provide

Related bug https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/700 - this feels like a dupe?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/754#issuecomment-145571063

Received on Monday, 5 October 2015 15:32:39 UTC