- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 06:35:29 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/128/r41143559@github.com>
> @@ -3979,9 +3990,52 @@ <h4 id="should-response-to-request-be-blocked-due-to-nosniff?"><dfn title="shoul > is itself associated with <span title=concept-Response-response>response</span>'s > <span title=concept-response-header-list>header list</span>. > > -<p>A <code>Response</code> object's <span title=concept-Body-body>body</span> is its > -<span title=concept-Response-response>response</span>'s > -<span title=concept-response-body>body</span>. > +<p>A <code>Response</code> object also has an associated > +<dfn title=concept-Response-readable-stream>readable stream</dfn> which is null or a > +<code title=concept-ReadableStream>ReadableStream</code> object. Its initial value is null. > + > +<p class="XXX">This might become a <code>ReadableByteStream</code> object, depending on the > +<a href="https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/379">the discussion</a>. The type might be "the the discussion" is wrong. I think this entire thing can be clearer as: `<a>This might become a ReadableByteStream object</a>. While the type might change, the behavior specified will be equivalent since the hypothetical ReadableByteStream object will have the same members as the ReadableStream object has today.` --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/128/files#r41143559
Received on Monday, 5 October 2015 13:35:57 UTC