- From: Xidorn Quan <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 03:07:10 -0700
- To: whatwg/fullscreen <fullscreen@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 10:08:52 UTC
Authors can always use `visibility: hidden` or `opacity: 0` for hiding it, can't they? > so ::backdrop is always positioned somehow, so it's already coerced to a block display type always. This makes sense to me. I was mainly concerned about the layout-internal values e.g. `table-*` and `ruby-*`, but it seems all of them will be coerced to `block` because of being positioned. After staring at our code, I have one more concern which is `display: contents`. According to the CSS Display spec, this value does not generate any box [1], and thus it is not affected by value of `position`. I guess it is fine to just treat it as `none` in this case. There are several other block display values I don't really want to handle, but I guess they are fine. > So we could just remove this line altogether? Sounds reasonable. If we decide not to force it, I think it's fine to just remove that line altogether. [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/#box-generation --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fullscreen/issues/25#issuecomment-144685721
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 10:08:52 UTC