- From: Ehsan Akhgari <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:34:23 -0800
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 27 November 2015 22:34:55 UTC
As far as I can tell from reading the spec, a `Client` representing a non-secure context cannot be observed. `Clients.matchAll()` when used with `includeUncontrolled: true` already excludes non-secure `Client`s. And `Clients.get()` also excludes non-secure `Client`s (and it's impossible to observe such a `clientId` in the first place since we don't dispatch `FetchEvent`s for such clients anyways). Does this mean that implementations are free to ignore the places in the spec where we're talking about `Client` objects being non-secure? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/791
Received on Friday, 27 November 2015 22:34:55 UTC