- From: youennf <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 00:22:38 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2015 08:23:09 UTC
Thanks for the information and links. I guess it is ok to leave the spec as is if pipeTo does not remain in the limbs for too long. Otherwise, maybe add something like "pipeTo relying on WritableStream abstract operations, it is expected to change significantly" or loosen the statement that the pipeTo reference implementation is considered normative. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/407#issuecomment-159532139
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2015 08:23:09 UTC