public-webapps-github@w3.org from May 2015 by date

Sunday, 31 May 2015

• [webidl] typo in the definition of an unrestricted double? (#51) littledan
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Cristian Talau
• [dom] Proposal: Node#appendSibling/prependSibling (#38) xlaywan
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Cristian Talau
• Re: [manifest] camelCase more suitable to JSON and JS API (#72) Sean Lang
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Ryosuke Niwa

Saturday, 30 May 2015

• [permissions] status of this document: reached FPWD (#36) Nick Doty
• Re: [permissions] Tackle origin (#34) Nick Doty
• Re: [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Cristian Talau
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• [clipboard-apis] What should happen when copying content with a CANVAS tag in?` (#8) Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Cristian Talau
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Hayato Ito
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) Jafar Husain
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) Cristian Talau
• Re: [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) Jafar Husain
• Re: [xhr] Remove XMLHttpRequest from ServiceWorkerGlobalScope (#19) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] response.bodyUsed is an ambiguous name (#57) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Ben Kelly
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 29 May 2015

• Re: [IndexedDB] Allow renaming object stores and indexes (#22) Joshua Bell
• [IndexedDB] Allow renaming object stores and indexes (#22) Joshua Bell
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) Cristian Talau
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Olivier Forget
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) Cristian Talau
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Wilson Page
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) Tomek Wytrębowicz
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) Hallvord R. M. Steen
• [streams] More concrete examples of "optimization" of pipeTo (#359) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) Philip Jägenstedt
• [ServiceWorker] What's proper SW name? :) (#705) karolklp
• Re: [webcomponents] Describe focus navigation order for the case with tabindex=-1 (#35) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] Change the order of insertion points which are involved in a re-distribution in event path (W3C bug 23887) (#42) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] Change the order of insertion points which are involved in a re-distribution in event path (W3C bug 23887) (#42) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: The return type of Event.path should leverage WebIDL sequences (bugzilla: 25458) (#101) Hayato Ito
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Cristian Talau
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM V2 (bugzilla: 15480) (#58) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM V2 (bugzilla: 15480) (#58) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 (bugzilla: 28552) (#75) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 (bugzilla: 28552) (#75) Hayato Ito
• Re: [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) Arun Ranganathan
• [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Hayato Ito
• Re: [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) ⭐caitp⭐
• Re: [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) Tab Atkins Jr.

Thursday, 28 May 2015

• Re: [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) Austin Cheney
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [IndexedDB] Add openCursor(key, primaryKey) and continuePrimaryKey (#14) Joshua Bell
• Re: [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) Philip Jägenstedt
• [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) manuelmitasch
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) manuelmitasch
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) manuelmitasch
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) sirdarckcat
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) sirdarckcat
• Re: [ServiceWorker] How to deal with cookie bombing (#704) sirdarckcat
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) sirdarckcat
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) James Burke
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Ben Kelly
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) manuelmitasch
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What caret positions do we need to allow? (#51) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) manuelmitasch
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Domenic Denicola
• [fetch] response.bodyUsed is an ambiguous name (#57) Johan Lorenzo
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What intentions do we need? (#52) Cristian Talau
• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) Ben Kelly
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Cristian Talau
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Koji Ishii
• Re: [editing-explainer] What caret positions do we need to allow? (#51) Koji Ishii
• [streams] Never-released lock / getReader({unreleasable: true}) (#358) Yutaka Hirano
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Wilson Page
• Re: [editing-explainer] What intentions do we need? (#52) Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Koji Ishii
• Re: [editing-explainer] What intentions do we need? (#52) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What intentions do we need? (#52) Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Koji Ishii
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Koji Ishii
• Re: [editing-explainer] What caret positions do we need to allow? (#51) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What intentions do we need? (#52) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Cristian Talau
• Re: [editing-explainer] What to do with execCommand? (#53) Frederico Caldeira Knabben
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Koji Ishii
• Re: [editing-explainer] What caret positions do we need to allow? (#51) Koji Ishii
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Koji Ishii
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) Tomek Wytrębowicz
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) Tomek Wytrębowicz
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) Takayoshi Kochi
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) Tomek Wytrębowicz
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Cristian Talau
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [editing-explainer] What intentions do we need? (#52) Cristian Talau
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) Hayato Ito
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• [FileAPI] Controlling Blob URL's (#8) joeedh
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm

Wednesday, 27 May 2015

• [editing-explainer] what intentions do we need? (#52) Johannes Wilm

Thursday, 28 May 2015

• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa

Wednesday, 27 May 2015

• [IndexedDB] Support binary keys (#21) Joshua Bell

Thursday, 28 May 2015

• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) Austin Cheney
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What caret positions do we need to allow? (#51) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] What caret positions do we need to allow? (#51) Ryosuke Niwa

Wednesday, 27 May 2015

• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34) Johannes Wilm

Thursday, 28 May 2015

• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Johannes Wilm

Wednesday, 27 May 2015

• Re: [editing-explainer] Do we need formatting events? (#49) Johannes Wilm

Thursday, 28 May 2015

• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) Tab Atkins Jr.

Wednesday, 27 May 2015

• Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the target element for Responsive Input Events? (#24) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the target element for Responsive Input Events? (#24) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) Jake Archibald
• Re: [editing-explainer] Need to be clear about users having control, then sites, then browser (#13) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Need to be clear about users having control, then sites, then browser (#13) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Jake Archibald
• [ServiceWorker] How to deal with cookie bombing (#704) Jake Archibald
• [ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) Jake Archibald
• [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handeling? (#57) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can we integrate with rich forms and validation? (#6) Johannes Wilm
• [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) Johannes Wilm
• [editing-explainer] switch caret between overtype and insert (#55) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can we integrate with rich forms and validation? (#6) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) Johannes Wilm
• [editing-explainer] What to do with execCommand (#53) Johannes Wilm
• [editing-explainer] What to do with contentEditableTrue? (#54) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [IndexedDB] Support binary keys (#21) Joshua Bell
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Notification after completion of Responsive Input Event (especially "custom" event types) (#17) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Notification after completion of Responsive Input Event (especially "custom" event types) (#17) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [IndexedDB] transaction (concept) should have an error property (#17) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] database version in deleteDatabase is not defined (#6) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Specify 'deleted' property of stores/indexes (#7) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Specify 'deleted' property of stores/indexes (#7) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Distinguish object store from thing IDBObjectStore represents (#3) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Distinguish object store from thing IDBObjectStore represents (#3) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Ensure connection/handle properties are snapshots (#20) Joshua Bell
• [fetch] Document usage for GET requests with URI parameters (#56) Sébastien Cevey
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) Tomek Wytrębowicz
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) Tomek Wytrębowicz
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Takeshi Yoshino
• [editing-explainer] legal caret states (#51) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) Jungkee Song
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: The return type of Event.path should leverage WebIDL sequences (bugzilla: 25458) (#101) Philip Jägenstedt
• [push-api] getSubscription() should permission check (#150) Nikhil Marathe
• Re: [push-api] Fire pushsubscriptionchange when user revokes permission (#116) Nikhil Marathe

Tuesday, 26 May 2015

• [IndexedDB] Ensure connection/handle properties are snapshots (#20) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Distinguish object store from thing IDBObjectStore represents (#3) Joshua Bell
• [xhr] Remove XMLHttpRequest from ServiceWorkerGlobalScope (#19) Philip Jägenstedt
• [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) Austin Cheney
• [webidl] Distinguishability of buffers source types needs to be defined better (#50) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Error Logging (#24) Ilya Grigorik
• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) Martin Thomson
• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) Martin Thomson
• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) Michael van Ouwerkerk
• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) Martin Thomson
• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) Michael van Ouwerkerk
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johan Sörlin
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) Florian Rivoal
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) Florian Rivoal
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) Koji Ishii
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) Florian Rivoal
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) Florian Rivoal
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) François REMY
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm

Monday, 25 May 2015

• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Olivier Forget
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Olivier Forget
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) zomp
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Olivier Forget
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How should custom controls declare their Responsive Input mapping? (#18) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How should custom controls declare their Responsive Input mapping? (#18) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) allanjuma
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Olivier Forget
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) Alexis Menard
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) Marcos Caceres
• [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) Olivier Forget
• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) Lewis Phạm
• Re: [editing-explainer] intents originating from components resp. scripts (#16) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] intents originating from components resp. scripts (#16) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should undo/redo be beforeInput events? (#30) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should undo/redo be beforeInput events? (#30) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Support for custom Responsive Input events (#14) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Support for custom Responsive Input events (#14) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Prevent recursive beforeInput calls (#44) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] Prevent recursive beforeInput calls (#44) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) Johannes Wilm
• [editing-explainer] formatting events (#49) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) Ben Kelly
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should undo/redo be beforeInput events? (#30) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) Lewis Phạm
• Re: [editing-explainer] D3E defines input event should be fired immediately after the DOM as been updated but it shouldn't be so if the editor value is changed by setting value attribute (#41) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] D3E defines input event should be fired immediately after the DOM as been updated but it shouldn't be so if the editor value is changed by setting value attribute (#41) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) Feross Aboukhadijeh
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) Ben Kelly
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) Kenneth Auchenberg
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) Feross Aboukhadijeh
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) Feross Aboukhadijeh
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) Ben Kelly
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Ben Kelly
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) Feross Aboukhadijeh
• [webcomponents] [Shadow] Change the order of insertion points which are involved in a re-distribution in event path (bugzilla: 23887) (#98) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: The return type of Event.path should leverage WebIDL sequences (bugzilla: 25458) (#101) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add "closed" flag to createShadowRoot (bugzilla: 20144) (#100) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider a notion of shared stylesheet (bugzilla: 15818) (#99) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Element.createShadowRoot() throws an exception for some elements (bugzilla: 27844) (#102) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: how is the autofocus attribute supposed to be handled? (bugzilla: 27757) (#97) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: There's isn't a way to append shadow elements in SVG (bugzilla: 24181) (#96) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: <content> usage in a place where non-flow content is expected (bugzilla: 22107) (#95) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider explicitly exporting CSS Variables across a shadow boundary (bugzilla: 17143) (#94) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM (bugzilla: 28587) (#93) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Have a common interface between Document and ShadowRoot (bugzilla: 28493) (#91) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider removal of multiple shadow roots (bugzilla: 28446) (#90) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Make event retargeting optional (bugzilla: 28444) (#89) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: inappropriate reference to CSS3-UI nav-index spec in focus navigation order (bugzilla: 28079) (#88) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Define the behavior of *closed* shadow trees. (bugzilla: 27775) (#85) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Multiple trees are introduced to explain encapsulation. (bugzilla: 23481) (#83) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Distribution needs to not be observable (bugzilla: 27994) (#87) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow host with tabindex=-1, all descendent tree should be ignored for tab navigation (bugzilla: 27965) (#86) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need mechanism to tell if an element in a ShadowRoot has been inserted into the Document (bugzilla: 22141) (#81) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Each section on the spec needs examples (bugzilla: 24639) (#84) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add support for external stylesheets using link rel="stylesheet" (bugzilla: 22539) (#82) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Node should expose their scope so that shared state can be scoped to components. (bugzilla: 22080) (#80) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Find a way for selection to work across shadow DOM subtrees (bugzilla: 15444) (#79) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Figure out a good replacement for /deep/ in testing scenarios (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Event model (bugzilla: 28564) (#77) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow] investigate if there should be deepRelatedTargets and touch.deepTargets (bugzilla: 28560) (#76) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 (bugzilla: 28552) (#75) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] to ShadowRoot.innerHTML (bugzilla: 28549) (#74) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Specify distribution in terms of event loop (bugzilla: 28443) (#73) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Fully explore composition (bugzilla: 27401) (#69) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Isolated Shadow trees (bugzilla: 28442) (#72) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider not using AT_TARGET more than once in the event path (bugzilla: 26892) (#68) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Declarative Shadow DOM (bugzilla: 28441) (#71) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need to define what .styleSheets actually does on a shadow root (bugzilla: 27418) (#70) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: elementFromPoint should return the host when you hit a Text node (bugzilla: 24638) (#67) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Form elements crossing shadow boundary (bugzilla: 22443) (#65) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider a <content> selector for "nodes not otherwise distributed" (bugzilla: 22268) (#64) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees (bugzilla: 26365) (#57) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM-based components could benefit from a way to detect when light DOM contents change (bugzilla: 21149) (#62) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow trees should somehow contain base URL information (bugzilla: 22255) (#63) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events (bugzilla: 20247) (#61) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Specify imperative API for node distribution (bugzilla: 18429) (#60) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider augmenting HTML parser to parse <shadow> and <content> just like <template> (bugzilla: 15616) (#59) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM V2 (bugzilla: 15480) (#58) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Style element should specify when to create and add style sheet in shadow DOM (bugzilla: 26850) (#56) Hayato Ito
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] How should custom controls declare their Responsive Input mapping? (#18) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) manuelmitasch

Sunday, 24 May 2015

• Re: [editing-explainer] behavior of text nodes inside cE=typing (#22) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [editing-explainer] behavior of text nodes inside cE=typing (#22) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) Alex Russell
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Jake Archibald
• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) Mounir Lamouri

Saturday, 23 May 2015

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) Alex Russell
• Re: [dom] Add [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] to Attr.nodeValue/textContent (#36) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) manuelmitasch
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Ben Kelly
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) manuelmitasch
• Re: [fetch] Add about:unicorn easter egg. (de21fbc) Sebastiaan Deckers
• Re: [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [dom] Add [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] to Attr.nodeValue/textContent (#36) Anne van Kesteren
• [IndexedDB] Introduce IDBKeySet (#19) Joshua Bell

Friday, 22 May 2015

• Re: [IndexedDB] Add scope attribute to IDBTransaction (#18) Joshua Bell
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) Daniel Appelquist
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) Domenic Denicola
• [IndexedDB] Add scope attribute to IDBTransaction (#18) Joshua Bell
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache API shouldn't be available outside the service workers (#702) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache API shouldn't be available outside the service workers (#702) Jake Archibald
• [dom] Add [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] to Attr.nodeValue/textContent (#36) Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [webcomponents] id -> name (#55) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] id -> name (#55) Hayato Ito
• [ServiceWorker] Cache API shouldn't be available outside the service workers (#702) sirdarckcat
• [webcomponents] id -> name (#55) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [spec-reviews] rough in fingerprinting (ba748e3) Mark Nottingham
• Re: [spec-reviews] rough in fingerprinting (ba748e3) Mark Nottingham
• Re: [spec-reviews] rough in fingerprinting (ba748e3) Mike West
• Re: [spec-reviews] rough in fingerprinting (ba748e3) Mike West
• Re: [spec-reviews] rough in fingerprinting (ba748e3) Mike West
• Re: [spec-reviews] rough in fingerprinting (ba748e3) Mike West
• Re: [webcomponents] Typo ;) (#54) Hayato Ito
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) Daniel Appelquist
• [webcomponents] Typo ;) (#54) Wilson Page
• Re: [webcomponents] Added a couple of algorithms and definitions. (#53) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] Added a couple of algorithms and definitions. (#53) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] Added a couple of algorithms and definitions. (#53) Hayato Ito
• Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Error Logging (#24) Alex Russell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Replace DOMError with DOMException (#16) Joshua Bell
• [IndexedDB] transaction (concept) should have an error property (#17) Joshua Bell

Thursday, 21 May 2015

• [IndexedDB] Replace DOMError with DOMException (#16) Joshua Bell
• [webcomponents] Added a couple of algorithms and definitions. (#53) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) Martin Thomson
• [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) Martin Thomson
• Re: [push-api] Fire pushsubscriptionchange when user revokes permission (#116) Martin Thomson
• Re: [push-api] Making cardinality clear (#148) Michael van Ouwerkerk
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider dropping initServiceWorkerMessageEvent() (#701) Jungkee Song
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider dropping initServiceWorkerMessageEvent() (#701) Jungkee Song
• [push-api] Making cardinality clear (#148) Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 20 May 2015

• Re: [spec-reviews] Browser Fingerprinting Document (#38) Daniel Appelquist
• Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) Daniel Appelquist
• Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) Daniel Appelquist
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSV on the Web (#55) Daniel Appelquist
• Re: [fetch] Cache state: partial content (#38) Honza Bambas
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider dropping initServiceWorkerMessageEvent() (#701) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider dropping initServiceWorkerMessageEvent() (#701) Jungkee Song
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) Jungkee Song
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) Jungkee Song
• Re: [push-api] Push events should Soft Update service worker (#115) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) Kinuko Yasuda
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Replaying POST requests (#693) karolklp
• [ServiceWorker] Consider dropping initServiceWorkerMessageEvent() (#701) bashi

Tuesday, 19 May 2015

• Re: [webcomponents] Stubbed out Slots proposal. (#52) Ryosuke Niwa
• [IndexedDB] Import issues from Bugzilla (#15) Joshua Bell
• [webcomponents] Stubbed out Slots proposal. (#52) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [clipboard-apis] Behavior of queryCommandEnabled (#7) Hallvord R. M. Steen
• [IndexedDB] Add openCursor(key, primaryKey) and continuePrimaryKey (#14) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Consider introducing "unbounded range" (#13) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Standardize key-or-keyrange argument handling (#12) Joshua Bell
• [IndexedDB] Consider introducing "unbounded range" (#13) Joshua Bell
• [IndexedDB] Standardize key-or-keyrange argument handling (#12) Joshua Bell
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.4 of openWindow uses the incumbent settings object, which makes no sense (#695) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (#357) Domenic Denicola
• [fetch] Request constructor does not check used flag on null body (#55) Ben Kelly
• Re: [manifest] Provide better examples of scope (#380) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Provide better examples of scope (#380) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) zomp
• [clipboard-apis] Behavior of queryCommandEnabled (#7) Daniel Cheng
• Re: [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) Mathias Bynens
• Re: [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) zomp
• Re: [spec-reviews] Remove 'signal upgrade' section in upgrade-insecure review (#58) Yan Zhu
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) Jake Archibald
• [fetch] Rename `response` in HTTP fetch 3.1.1-2 (#54) Ms2ger
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) Jake Archibald
• Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: [ServiceWorker] A header/something to kill SWs (#614) Jake Archibald
• Re: [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) Mathias Bynens
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Replaying POST requests (#693) Ben Kelly
• Re: [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (0c57047) Ben Kelly
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Replaying POST requests (#693) Jake Archibald
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) Jake Archibald
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) Frederico Caldeira Knabben
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) Johannes Wilm
• [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) zomp
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) Frederico Caldeira Knabben
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) Kinuko Yasuda
• Re: [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (0c57047) Yutaka Hirano
• Re: [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (0c57047) Yutaka Hirano
• Re: [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (0c57047) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (0c57047) Yutaka Hirano
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) Alex Russell
• [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Domenic Denicola

Monday, 18 May 2015

• [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (#357) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Scott Kyle
• [IndexedDB] Validate exception ordering against implementations (#11) Joshua Bell
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) Johannes Wilm
• [IndexedDB] Standardize relationship between concept-objects and interface-objects (#10) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Specify 'deleted' property of stores/indexes (#7) Joshua Bell
• [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) Johannes Wilm
• Re: [ServiceWorker] navigator.serviceWorker is not defined (#689) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.4 of openWindow uses the incumbent settings object, which makes no sense (#695) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.4 of openWindow uses the incumbent settings object, which makes no sense (#695) Jake Archibald
• [ServiceWorker] Restrict openWindow() to http(s) schemes? (#699) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] about:blank handling in openWindow doesn't make much sense (#696) Jake Archibald
• Re: [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) Anne van Kesteren

Sunday, 17 May 2015

• Re: [ServiceWorker] There should be no such thing as "fail to activate" (#659) István Szmozsánszky

Saturday, 16 May 2015

• Re: [manifest] Provide better examples of scope (#380) Jeff Burtoft

Friday, 15 May 2015

• Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) Ben Kelly
• Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) Ben Kelly
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) jan-ivar
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Petka Antonov
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) jan-ivar
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Duan Yao
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Petka Antonov
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) aphillips
• Re: [fetch] Abort fetch upon document unload (#53) Ilya Grigorik
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Andrea Giammarchi
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Duan Yao
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) jan-ivar
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Duan Yao
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Duan Yao
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) jan-ivar
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Duan Yao
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Manish Goregaokar
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Duan Yao
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Jussi Kalliokoski
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Rob Wu
• [fetch] Abort fetch upon unload document unload (#53) Rob Wu
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Benjamin Gruenbaum
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Andrea Giammarchi
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Kyle Simpson
• Re: [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) Mike West
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Petka Antonov
• [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) Tsuyoshi Horo
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Scott Kyle

Thursday, 14 May 2015

• Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) Kornel
• Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) Jake Archibald
• Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) Ilya Grigorik
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) Jake Archibald
• Re: [streams] Added some more readable stream tests (#315) Xabier Rodríguez
• Re: [webstorage] Make sample code indent consistent (#3) Xiaoqian Cindy Wu
• [webstorage] Make sample code indent consistent (#3) Zhiqiang Zhang

Wednesday, 13 May 2015

• Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) Mark Nottingham
• Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) Louis Ryan
• [IndexedDB] task behavior for open requests is poorly specified (#9) Joshua Bell
• Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) Martin Thomson
• Re: [IndexedDB] Asynchronously completed operations should "queue a task" (#1) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Asynchronously completed operations should "queue a task" (#1) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Define key extraction/injection using [[DefineOwnProperty]] and [[Get]] (#2) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Define key extraction/injection using [[DefineOwnProperty]] and [[Get]] (#2) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Introduce Upgrades as concept section (#8) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Introduce Upgrades as concept section (#8) Joshua Bell
• Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) Louis Ryan
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) Marcos Caceres
• [fetch] HTTP/2 server push support (#51) Martin Thomson
• Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) Martin Thomson
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) r0b5t4
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) r0b5t4
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Duan Yao
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) Duan Yao
• Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) Joel Weinberger
• [IndexedDB] Introduce Upgrades as concept section (#8) Joshua Bell
• Re: [webcomponents] Timing experiment (#51) Ryosuke Niwa

Tuesday, 12 May 2015

• [webcomponents] Timing experiment (#51) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [IndexedDB] Distinguish object store from thing IDBObjectStore represents (#3) Joshua Bell
• Re: [streams] Added some more readable stream tests (#315) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Added some more readable stream tests (#315) Domenic Denicola
• [dom] Add hint that `event.bubbles` is configurable. (#35) Alex Yursha
• Re: [webstorage] w3c stylesheet needs to be httpS (#2) Yves Lafon
• [webstorage] w3c stylesheet needs to be httpS (#2) Arthur Barstow
• Re: [webstorage] Add link to "live" version of the spec. (#1) Yves Lafon
• Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) Jake Archibald
• Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) Joel Weinberger
• Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Fallback to App Cache (#697) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) Rick Byers
• Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) Taylor Hunt

Monday, 11 May 2015

• Re: [IndexedDB] Convert remaining methods to "algorithmic style" (#5) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Convert remaining methods to "algorithmic style" (#5) Joshua Bell
• [IndexedDB] Specify 'deleted' property of stores/indexes (#7) Joshua Bell
• [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) manuelmitasch
• Re: [touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) Patrick H. Lauke
• [IndexedDB] database version in deleteDatabase is not defined (#6) Joshua Bell
• Re: [IndexedDB] Keypath evaluation steps yield a value, not a key (#4) Joshua Bell
• Re: [touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) Rick Byers
• Re: [manifest] Provide better examples of scope (#380) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [ServiceWorker] You don't need any flags in Chrome today :) (#686) karolklp
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Fallback to App Cache (#697) Artem Andreev
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Fallback to App Cache (#697) Artem Andreev
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Fallback to App Cache (#697) Jungkee Song
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) Jungkee Song

Sunday, 10 May 2015

• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Yan Zhu
• [spec-reviews] Remove 'signal upgrade' section in upgrade-insecure review (#58) Yan Zhu
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 9 May 2015

• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) allanjuma
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) Marcos Caceres
• [dom] insert/remove hooks need to be invoked for ancestor changes too (#34) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Feed a Response to existing APIs (#49) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) allanjuma
• Re: [fetch] Feed a Response to existing APIs (#49) Ben Kelly
• Re: [fetch] Feed a Response to existing APIs (#49) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) Ben Kelly
• Re: [fetch] Feed a Response to existing APIs (#49) Ben Kelly
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Replaying POST requests (#693) Ben Kelly
• Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) Ben Kelly
• Re: [manifest] Provide better examples of scope (#380) Jeff Burtoft
• Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) Jeff Burtoft

Friday, 8 May 2015

• Re: [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364) Alex Russell
• Re: [clipboard-apis] Fix the handling of password fields with the copy and cut actions (#5) Ehsan Akhgari
• [manifest] Provide better examples of scope (#380) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [clipboard-apis] Fix the handling of password fields with the copy and cut actions (#5) Anne van Kesteren
• [clipboard-apis] Fix the handling of the default cut action when we're not in an editable context (#6) Ehsan Akhgari
• [clipboard-apis] Fix the handling of password fields with the copy and cut actions (#5) Ehsan Akhgari
• [IndexedDB] Convert remaining methods to "algorithmic style" (#5) Joshua Bell
• [IndexedDB] Keypath evaluation steps yield a value, not a key (#4) Joshua Bell
• Re: [touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) Scott González
• Re: [touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) Patrick H. Lauke
• [touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) Rick Byers
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Martin Thomson
• [ServiceWorker] Fallback to App Cache (#697) Artem Andreev
• [clipboard-apis] Should queryCommandEnabled(cut|copy|paste) trigger onbefore* events? (#4) Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: [dom] Rewrite replaceWith/before/after algorithms (#32) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] [Bug 27775] Update Element.getDestinationInsertionPoints(), using the 'an unclosed node of' relation'. (644a0fa) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] There should be no such thing as "fail to activate" (#659) Jungkee Song
• Re: [ServiceWorker] There should be no such thing as "fail to activate" (#659) Jungkee Song
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] Define the non-symmetric relation, called 'an unclosed tree of', between two node trees. (503e27c) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] [Bug 27775] Update Element.getDestinationInsertionPoints(), using the 'an unclosed node of' relation'. (644a0fa) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] Define the non-symmetric relation, called 'an unclosed tree of', between two node trees. (503e27c) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] [Bug 27775] Update Element.getDestinationInsertionPoints(), using the 'an unclosed node of' relation'. (644a0fa) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] Define the non-symmetric relation, called 'an unclosed tree of', between two node trees. (503e27c) Hayato Ito
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] Define the non-symmetric relation, called 'an unclosed tree of', between two node trees. (503e27c) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) Jungkee Song

Thursday, 7 May 2015

• [IndexedDB] Distinguish object store from thing IDBObjectStore represents (#3) Joshua Bell
• Re: [spec-reviews] Upgrade Insecure Requests (#50) Yan Zhu
• Re: [spec-reviews] Upgrade Insecure Requests (#50) Yan Zhu
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Yan Zhu
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Yan Zhu
• Re: [spec-reviews] Subresource Integrity (#43) Yan Zhu
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Yan Zhu
• Re: [permissions] Tackle origin (#34) Martin Thomson
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Brenton Simpson
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) David Graham
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) Joshua Bell
• [ServiceWorker] about:blank handling in openWindow doesn't make much sense (#696) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [fetch] Say something rather vague about priority to at least acknowledge it exists. Fixes the remainder of #43. (600ccb7) Ilya Grigorik
• [ServiceWorker] Step 5.4 of openWindow uses the incumbent settings object, which makes no sense (#695) Boris Zbarsky
• [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [permissions] Tackle origin (#34) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [fetch] Allow context to be set (#48) Mike West
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Mike West
• Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [permissions] Tackle origin (#34) Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) Jungkee Song
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) Jungkee Song
• Re: [fetch] PATCH verb (#50) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] PATCH verb (#50) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) Xidorn Quan
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) Jungkee Song
• [fetch] PATCH verb (#50) Luke Page
• Re: [fetch] Feed a Response to existing APIs (#49) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) Jungkee Song
• [fetch] Feed a Response to existing APIs (#49) Anne van Kesteren
• [fetch] Allow context to be set (#48) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) Jungkee Song
• Re: [dom] Add a common conjugation of "case-sensitive" (#33) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Cache mode: security review (#39) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Privacy consideration about the "cache" parameter of the Request object (#585) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Privacy consideration about the "cache" parameter of the Request object (#585) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Anne van Kesteren
• [ServiceWorker] Replaying POST requests (#693) karolklp
• Re: [push-api] Push event shouldn't be dispatched to an activating worker (#147) Anne van Kesteren
• [fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) Philip Jägenstedt
• [push-api] Push event shouldn't be dispatched to an activating worker (#147) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) Ilya Grigorik
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [streams] Add descriptions to ReadableStreamController methods (4d5a2a3) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Update local build instructions (c80e15e) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [FileAPI] Use ASCII origin in blob URLs (#7) Arun Ranganathan
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Privacy consideration about the "cache" parameter of the Request object (#585) Matt Falkenhagen
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) Cameron McCormack
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) Cameron McCormack
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) Jungkee Song
• Re: [ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) Nikhil Marathe

Wednesday, 6 May 2015

• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Martin Thomson
• Re: [permissions] Tackle origin (#34) Martin Thomson
• Re: [permissions] What should "retrieve the permission state" do for context related permissions? (#9) Martin Thomson
• Re: [permissions] What should "retrieve the permission state" do for pickers? (#8) Martin Thomson
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) Ed Hager
• Re: [webcomponents] Started on partial redistributions analysis. (#50) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) Domenic Denicola
• [webcomponents] Started on partial redistributions analysis. (#50) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) Domenic Denicola
• [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) Ed Hager
• [dom] Add a common conjugation of "case-sensitive" (#33) Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Yan Zhu
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Mike West
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Alex Russell
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Yan Zhu
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Mike West
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Andrea Giammarchi
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Alexander Abashkin
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Arthur Stolyar
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Mike West
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) Mike West
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Dmitry Korobkin
• Re: [FileAPI] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) Arthur Barstow
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Alexander Abashkin
• Re: [FileAPI] Use ASCII origin in blob URLs (#7) Anne van Kesteren
• [FileAPI] Use ASCII origin in blob URLs (#7) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [permissions] Remove global variables (#35) Anne van Kesteren
• [permissions] Remove global variables (#35) Anne van Kesteren
• [permissions] Tackle origin (#34) Anne van Kesteren
• [permissions] Define underlying infrastructure (#33) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Brenton Simpson
• [spec-reviews] Media Capture and Streams (#57) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) Jungkee Song
• Re: [manifest] Typo fix (#379) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Re: [manifest] Typo fix (#379) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• [manifest] Typo fix (#379) Janusz Majnert
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (#46) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (#46) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) Ilya Grigorik
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (#46) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (#46) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) Marcos Caceres
• [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) Brenton Simpson

Tuesday, 5 May 2015

• Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) Travis Leithead
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) Ilya Grigorik
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (#378) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (8711327) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (#378) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Added splash_screens member (closes #9) (#371) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (#351) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] From a security perspective, why should the manifest be same origin? (#375) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Make manifest authoritative + allow CORS (closes #376, #375, #360, #330,#351, #272) (#377) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Should a manifest unambigiously and authoritively be the app's metadata? (#376) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Make manifest authoritative + allow CORS (closes #376, #375, #360, #330, #351, #272) (4145171) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• [manifest] Make manifest authoritative + allow CORS (closes #376, #375, #360, #330,#351, #272) (#377) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (#46) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (1d51c7c) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (1d51c7c) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (1d51c7c) Anne van Kesteren
• [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (#46) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) Rick Byers
• Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) Ilya Grigorik
• Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) Ilya Grigorik
• Re: [fetch] Add support for federated token binding to fetch (#30) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) Anne van Kesteren
• [dom] Rewrite replaceWith/before/after algorithms (#32) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) Janusz Majnert
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [webcomponents] Update Imperative-API-for-Node-Distribution-in-Shadow-DOM.md (#49) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [webcomponents] Update Imperative-API-for-Node-Distribution-in-Shadow-DOM.md (#49) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [webcomponents] Update Imperative-API-for-Node-Distribution-in-Shadow-DOM.md (#49) ojan
• [webcomponents] Update Imperative-API-for-Node-Distribution-in-Shadow-DOM.md (#49) ojan
• Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) Paul Cotton

Monday, 4 May 2015

• Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) Ilya Grigorik
• Re: [selection-api] Specify Selection.modify()? (#37) Nicholas Jakobsen
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Travis Leithead
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) Jonas Sicking
• [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) Ben Kelly
• Re: [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) Matt Cook
• Re: [xhr] Remove extraneous "=" in mail subject (#18) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [xhr] Remove extraneous "=" in mail subject (#18) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) Ben Kelly
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [dom] Attribute lowercasing does not appear to match browsers or web-platform-tests (#31) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] should SW MessageEvents inherit ExtendableEvent? (#690) Jungkee Song
• Re: [ServiceWorker] should SW MessageEvents inherit ExtendableEvent? (#690) Jungkee Song
• Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) Jungkee Song
• Re: [dom] Attribute lowercasing does not appear to match browsers or web-platform-tests (#31) Boris Zbarsky

Sunday, 3 May 2015

• Re: [streams] WritableStream constructor: strategy should be set before sync with queue (#346) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Non-normative descriptions are missing for ReadableStreamController (#350) Domenic Denicola
• [streams] ReadableByteStream needs reference implementation/tests (#355) Domenic Denicola
• [streams] ReadableByteStream underlying source/controller design: return a promise vs. c.something (#354) Domenic Denicola
• [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Update byte stream spec (#351) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Update byte stream spec (#351) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) Diego Perini
• Re: [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) István Szmozsánszky
• Re: [dom] Attribute lowercasing does not appear to match browsers or web-platform-tests (#31) Domenic Denicola
• [dom] Attribute lowercasing does not appear to match browsers or web-platform-tests (#31) Domenic Denicola

Saturday, 2 May 2015

• Re: [dom] cloneNode underspecified for attribute copying (#30) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [dom] cloneNode underspecified for attribute copying (#30) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 1 May 2015

• [dom] cloneNode underspecified for attribute copying (#30) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [webcomponents] Added fastdom callback idea. (#48) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [webcomponents] Added fastdom callback idea. (#48) Dimitri Glazkov
• [webcomponents] Added fastdom callback idea. (#48) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) Alex Lu
• [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) Matt Cook
• Re: [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) Dimitri Glazkov
• [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [manifest] Should a manifest unambigiously and authoritively be the app's metadata? (#376) Alex Russell
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) Alex Russell
• Re: [manifest] Should a manifest unambigiously and authoritively be the app's metadata? (#376) Janusz Majnert
• Re: [manifest] Should a manifest unambigiously and authoritively be the app's metadata? (#376) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [streams] Add SNAPSHOT-LINK argument to the bikeshed command line in README.md (#348) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) Martin Thomson
• Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [manifest] Should a manifest unambigiously and authoritively be the app's metadata? (#376) Janusz Majnert
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) Janusz Majnert
• Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) Janusz Majnert
• Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) Peter Beverloo
• [ServiceWorker] should SW MessageEvents inherit ExtendableEvent? (#690) Ben Kelly
• Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) Peter Beverloo
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) Kyle Simpson
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [streams] Remove closedPromise from ReadableStream's internal slot list (#352) Domenic Denicola
• Re: [webcomponents] Fix the table-chart example (#46) Hayato Ito
• [webcomponents] Fix the table-chart example (#46) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [webcomponents] Make proposals more clear (#45) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [webcomponents] Make proposals more clear (#45) Anne van Kesteren
• [webcomponents] Make proposals more clear (#45) Anne van Kesteren
• [packaging-on-the-web] Link headers as an alternative? (#26) Andrew Betts
• Re: [dom] Export all the terms in the spec, and fix a few definitions/autolinks (#29) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) Takeshi Yoshino
• [streams] Remove closedPromise from ReadableStream's internal slot list (#352) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Byte streams tracking bug (#300) Takeshi Yoshino
• [streams] Update byte stream spec (#351) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Add tests for checking that tee() branches are errored/closed when the o... (#349) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [streams] Add tests for checking that tee() branches are errored/closed when the o... (#349) Takeshi Yoshino
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) Ilya Grigorik
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) Mark Nottingham
• Re: [webcomponents] Add https://gist.github.com/rniwa/2f14588926e1a11c65d3 to proposals. (#44) Dimitri Glazkov
• [webcomponents] Add https://gist.github.com/rniwa/2f14588926e1a11c65d3 to proposals. (#44) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [webcomponents] Add `proposals` directory. (#43) Ryosuke Niwa
• [dom] Export all the terms in the spec, and fix a few definitions/autolinks (#29) Tab Atkins Jr.

Last message date: Sunday, 31 May 2015 19:10:21 UTC