Re: [fetch] Proposed backward-incompatible change: requiring cloning all requests/responses (#61)

> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/61#issuecomment-114896481

I am not happy with getReader() setting the flag. Getting a reader should not be a destructive operation; it is completely reversible with `rs.getReader().releaseLock()`.

The original post proposes that the various consuming methods set the flag. If a more generic mechanism is desired, then I think that `offset` as in https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/367 makes more sense.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/61#issuecomment-115004763